Tory Donor Lord Bamford Funds The Reform...
News2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by c3111068. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.In the case of an epidemic, the amount of increase in cases is exteremly arbitrary - 100 cases of measles in London might not be regarded as an epidemic, but 100 cases of Lassa fever certainly would be. Localized epidemics are usually referred to as "outbreaks"
A pandemic is an epidemic that involves several continents at the same time.
A question was asked in the House of Lords regarding the definition of "epidemic" and the reply was:
"The epidemiological definition of an epidemic is an increase in the frequency of occurrence of a disease in a population above its baseline level for a specified period of time. The term epidemic can be used when describing the pattern of either infectious or chronic diseases in the population.
Administrative definitions can be set for different diseases in which an arbitrary threshold is selected above which the term "epidemic" is applied. In the case of influenza, the Department of Health introduced in 1996 an administrative definition of an "epidemic" for a rate of consultation (with a sample of general practices) of 400 per 100,000 population in a week"
Pandemic usually refers to an epidemic covering a wide geographic area and often an entire country.
In actual fact the increase in rate of consultations is SO arbitrary, that while it is correct that an extra 400 per 100,000 for flu, whould consititute an epidemic in England, it requires an extra 1000 cases per 100,000 in Scotland.
Also, most people would now agree that a pandemic requires spread outwith one country