ChatterBank5 mins ago
Rishi Sunak – ‘Brexit Will Be Amazing’
44 Answers
How did that go?
Plus Sunak has denied Brexit is having a negative impact – we’ve got no hope with such a deluded fool in charge.
It makes you wonder how such incompetents manage to become prime minister.
Plus Sunak has denied Brexit is having a negative impact – we’ve got no hope with such a deluded fool in charge.
It makes you wonder how such incompetents manage to become prime minister.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is amazingly good, but he hasn't the guts to make the most of it. He's too keen on keeping in with various global groups and so not up to the job of national leader. The problem is, is is clear that any other main party would be worse. These are "interesting" times, we'll be in a better position when they've passed.
Lor' he don't half talk a load of gibberish at the start doesn't he. Then he tries to minimise facts he don't like, calling them technically correct. He doesn't seem a trurstworthy source.
Of course the EU has a right to do this or that, but it is the choices they deliberately choose to make that cause the issues.
And what's all this guano about the Tories not telling folk in the EU what to do ? He seems to raise strawmen arguments to enable him make invalid criticisms. Useless.
As for blaming the EU, well obviously. Because Brexiteers, unlike some, like to tell the truth. Granted one assumed the EU would be adult & responsible; maybe remainers realised the EU definitely wouldn't be earlier (in which case why did they support them ?), but we now all know how the EU has responded on everything. And even with them doing their worst, and the remoaners continuing backing them, against their own nation, it is still better than before Brexit; and with restrictions lifted has more potential to get better still on the global stage. That is provided we get rid of the 'do little save kowtow to global groups' politicians, and put an individual determined to advance the UK interests in charge of government.
Of course the EU has a right to do this or that, but it is the choices they deliberately choose to make that cause the issues.
And what's all this guano about the Tories not telling folk in the EU what to do ? He seems to raise strawmen arguments to enable him make invalid criticisms. Useless.
As for blaming the EU, well obviously. Because Brexiteers, unlike some, like to tell the truth. Granted one assumed the EU would be adult & responsible; maybe remainers realised the EU definitely wouldn't be earlier (in which case why did they support them ?), but we now all know how the EU has responded on everything. And even with them doing their worst, and the remoaners continuing backing them, against their own nation, it is still better than before Brexit; and with restrictions lifted has more potential to get better still on the global stage. That is provided we get rid of the 'do little save kowtow to global groups' politicians, and put an individual determined to advance the UK interests in charge of government.
If Sunak was to read just a small sample of my posts on this site he would be aware that (according to the Office for Budget Responsibility), the UK exchequer is down £40 billion in tax receipts as a direct result of this Brexit – which he thinks is having no negative impact.
What a deluded incompetent fool we have as a prime minister.
What a deluded incompetent fool we have as a prime minister.
As I’ve mentioned many times before, I work for a FTSE100 company – if the CEO announced to share-holders that he had taken a decision that would reduce the company’s turn-over by 15%; I can assure you that the share holders would not be saying ‘he’s made a decision – let’s make the best of it’. They would be saying, let’s get rid of this idiot.
And if the CEO made a decision that demonstrably reduced the company’s turn-over by 15% and the CEO stated that the decision was having no negative effects on the company’s financial performance – they would also get rid of him.
And if the CEO made a decision that demonstrably reduced the company’s turn-over by 15% and the CEO stated that the decision was having no negative effects on the company’s financial performance – they would also get rid of him.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.