Burger King or McDonalds?

[answerbankin]

McDonalds for me cos its cheaper and you get bigger portions. and the fillet o fish is the best burger in the world.

[robber1]

I have tried both companies once. They were both dreadful.Burger and chips on a tray, Ketchup,salt etc all spill out on the tray which most likely has not been cleaned properly.The food had to be gathered with the fingers, off the tray. Washed down with Coke.I felt like I was eating in a prison cell. Totally awfull experience.Never again.

[coemgen]

If I really had to eat in either of these places, it would have to be a BK beanburger.

[Fluffyudders]

Right, some simple facts. Firstly, BK IS nicer, it's as simple as that. Theres no question of taste here, McDs is ok but nothing compared to the BK taste. Secondly, BK is more expensive, and not really by a small margin. They do rip you off there, but it's worth it if you have the extra cash spare. Lastly, and by far the most important, KFC is better than both combined. A meal there is only a little more expensive than McDs (20p I think) and the chicken fillet burger (sticking to burgers here for fairness) is far superior to anything you can get anywhere else. Try comparing a KFC fillet burger to a McChicken Sandwich and you'll see what I mean....anyone else agree?

[Jo984]

I recommend you read the book Fast Food Nation - I haven't touched a fastfood restaurant since. Everthing is based on flavouring. And the calories are horrendous!