Business & Finance3 mins ago
No record of death
Is there any reason a death may not have been recorded.
The death would have occurred between 1896 and 1950
The death would have occurred between 1896 and 1950
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sigma. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Many reasons for omissions. Bad writing, mistranscription, loss of records.
In the case of my Cullimore item, due to bad writing it was Collimore at the GRO, but being a local name, the Welsh registry recorded it as Cullimore.
Not quite the period of your problem but if you read 'Comedy of Errors' by Mike Foster, a New Zealand academic who was allowed to examine the records and who wrote a detailed and scholarly analysis, you will find he estimated 1m names are omitted, mistranscibed etc from the GRO indexes between 1837-1900.
Surprisingly he was allowed back for a second visit resulting in yet more alarming revelations, and if memory serves it was then that he found index slips between index drawers and the cabinets ... .
He wrote a second book about that visit.
Digitisation of these records is long overdue.
In the case of my Cullimore item, due to bad writing it was Collimore at the GRO, but being a local name, the Welsh registry recorded it as Cullimore.
Not quite the period of your problem but if you read 'Comedy of Errors' by Mike Foster, a New Zealand academic who was allowed to examine the records and who wrote a detailed and scholarly analysis, you will find he estimated 1m names are omitted, mistranscibed etc from the GRO indexes between 1837-1900.
Surprisingly he was allowed back for a second visit resulting in yet more alarming revelations, and if memory serves it was then that he found index slips between index drawers and the cabinets ... .
He wrote a second book about that visit.
Digitisation of these records is long overdue.
In the 1890's she was arrested on numerous occasions and fined 10s for being drunk and disorderly. She also used to pawn the children's clothes so that she had enough money to go drinking which resulted in her being prosecuted at least twice by the N.S.P.C.C. for "unlawfully neglecting her children" for which she was sentenced to 3 months hard labour. All the cases including assault were put down to her drinking.