Donate SIGN UP

Accession

Avatar Image
35artillery38 | 12:58 Tue 16th Jun 2020 | History
14 Answers
Who would have succeeded King George VI if the rule of accession had to be MALE was changed?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by 35artillery38. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If the Salic law applied, forbidding women to ascend the throne it would have been Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester, brother of George VI.
I don't quite understand the question. The rule of succession did not stipulate that the heir had to be male. Do you mean if had stipulated the heir had to be male?
Not really relevant. That allows females to precede their younger brothers. As I have said, if the princesses Elizabeth and Margaret were forbidden by law, the next in line was the Duke of Gloucester.
Fascinating to speculate bywhat the history of the 20C might have been if the change had been in force over 100 years ago. Victoria would have been succeeded by her eldest child, who would have reigned as Victoria II. As she was dying of cancer she would have been succeeded by her son, Kaiser Wilhelm II. Would two world wars have come about then?
Jackdaw, what is relevant is what it replaced in relation to a male succeeding.
If women were forbidden by law to be monarch, as they were in Germany, then Victoria would not have become queen but her uncle Ernest Augustus would have, as he did in Hanover.
Yes, she would. She was only the dowager empress in Germany but would have succeeded to the throne of the UK.
as a q clear enough - who was the nearest male in line of succession ( you have gathered 25A38 that you dont accede to a throne but succeed)

first you have to decide if Edward VIII re inherits - as sort of Edward VIII pt 2 = otherwise it would be the next brother to George VI ( henry duke of gloucs)
actually the only problem is that we know he carried the gene for porphyria and passed it onto his son - the one that died in an air crash

the only thing about who would have succeeded questions is - - - the protestant succession by act of parliament in 1701

which basically established Parliament can enact the succession to whomever it likes .....
Question Author
Thanks everyone,it looks as though I might have got my facts wrong somewhere along the line.
Change that rule and go far enough back and there may have been no George VI to ask about.
the act of settlement disinherited around 40 better claimants to the throne because they were roman catholics

they just settled on Sophia the Electress of Hanover
it coulda been Mrs Mopp darn da rowd
or that awful what sa name
Exactly my point. The descendants of Princess Victoria would have occupied the throne.
Sophia was the nearest protestant in line, being the granddaughter of James I.

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Accession

Answer Question >>