News26 mins ago
Accession
14 Answers
Who would have succeeded King George VI if the rule of accession had to be MALE was changed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 35artillery38. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Fascinating to speculate bywhat the history of the 20C might have been if the change had been in force over 100 years ago. Victoria would have been succeeded by her eldest child, who would have reigned as Victoria II. As she was dying of cancer she would have been succeeded by her son, Kaiser Wilhelm II. Would two world wars have come about then?
as a q clear enough - who was the nearest male in line of succession ( you have gathered 25A38 that you dont accede to a throne but succeed)
first you have to decide if Edward VIII re inherits - as sort of Edward VIII pt 2 = otherwise it would be the next brother to George VI ( henry duke of gloucs)
actually the only problem is that we know he carried the gene for porphyria and passed it onto his son - the one that died in an air crash
the only thing about who would have succeeded questions is - - - the protestant succession by act of parliament in 1701
which basically established Parliament can enact the succession to whomever it likes .....
first you have to decide if Edward VIII re inherits - as sort of Edward VIII pt 2 = otherwise it would be the next brother to George VI ( henry duke of gloucs)
actually the only problem is that we know he carried the gene for porphyria and passed it onto his son - the one that died in an air crash
the only thing about who would have succeeded questions is - - - the protestant succession by act of parliament in 1701
which basically established Parliament can enact the succession to whomever it likes .....