I'm Really Worried I Have Upset My...
Family & Relationships0 min ago
Am i correct in thinking that, aswell as Cornwall, Scotland and Wales, Kent remained a Celtic region of Britain after the Romans landed, even though they landed in Kent? (I know that, instead of ultimately fleeing to the furthest reaches of this island, some celtic tribes accepted the Roman rule and worked with them in return for certain freedoms)
If so, does Kent have a similar case to Cornwall and Wales with regards devolution..?!
Finally!!! Could this be why someone or something of, relating to, or being from Kent is known as Kentish? (Kent and Cornwall seem to be the only counties which can have an 'ish' attached to them in the same way that countries do)
No best answer has yet been selected by jgs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ......... whilst we are waiting for a more informed answer than I can give you, here are some Fair Maids of Kent ...
IAP, not sure why you should think that Kent NEVER having been peopled by Celts would be a source of disallusionment for me.
The fact remains though that Celts did once live there....(except maybe they were posh ones....there, how does that sound?)
Thanks for the other info....didn't know about the Wightish people and i live just across the Solent from them....thanks.