ChatterBank0 min ago
I Read Somewhere That England Hadn't Been Invaded By A Foreign Power Since 1066.
Is that strictly true? Didn't a Scottish army get as far south as Derby in the 18th Century?
Answers
You could also argue that William of Orange invaded (via Brixham of all places) in November 1688 on his way to becoming King William III
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Glori ous_Rev olution
https:/
William III invaded England in 1688. He was welcomed by collaborators and duly took the throne while James II (one of whose daughters had married William) fled abroad.
And yes, Bonnie Prince Charlie did invade in 1745, though the only battle on English soil seems to have been small scale
https:/ /i0.wp. com/bit aboutbr itain.c om/wp-c ontent/ uploads /2019/1 2/Clift on_Moor _Sign.j pg?w=50 0&s sl=1
The very last battle on English soil was a very small one indeed, but as recently as 1940. The victors bought the losers a round of beer.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Battl e_of_Gr aveney_ Marsh
And yes, Bonnie Prince Charlie did invade in 1745, though the only battle on English soil seems to have been small scale
https:/
The very last battle on English soil was a very small one indeed, but as recently as 1940. The victors bought the losers a round of beer.
https:/
https:/ /www.hi story.c om/this -day-in -histor y/john- paul-jo nes-lea ds-amer ican-ra id-on-w hitehav en-engl and
I like this bit - " the other boat returned without attempting an attack on the northern fort, after the sailors claimed to have been frightened away by a noise"
I like this bit - " the other boat returned without attempting an attack on the northern fort, after the sailors claimed to have been frightened away by a noise"
Some reckon another had started in the capital.
https:/ /www.cn bc.com/ video/2 022/05/ 16/lond ongrad- how-rus sias-wa r-expos ed-the- dark-si de-of-l uxury-l ondon.h tml
https:/
not foreign
1685 Monmouth was son of A king
1688 william of orange's landing Brixham was by invitation
1715 and 45 - Bony Prince Charlie was a stuart and doesnt count
and THAT dear reader ( bizarre to some of the average double digiter ABers ) why the Normany invasion was er Normandy landings - even at the time ( debarquements) er 1944 that is !
1685 Monmouth was son of A king
1688 william of orange's landing Brixham was by invitation
1715 and 45 - Bony Prince Charlie was a stuart and doesnt count
and THAT dear reader ( bizarre to some of the average double digiter ABers ) why the Normany invasion was er Normandy landings - even at the time ( debarquements) er 1944 that is !
///william of orange's landing Brixham was by invitation///
by the 5Cs, PP. Just as well there was no Answerbank on which true-born Englishmen could excoriate them.
I don't think the fact that the Stuarts were (ex-)royals makes any difference. The Kaiser was Victoria's grandson, as the Old Pretender was Charles I's grandson. The only point of distinction was that the Kaiser was descended though a female and the OP through a male - and we mustn't be sexist about this.
by the 5Cs, PP. Just as well there was no Answerbank on which true-born Englishmen could excoriate them.
I don't think the fact that the Stuarts were (ex-)royals makes any difference. The Kaiser was Victoria's grandson, as the Old Pretender was Charles I's grandson. The only point of distinction was that the Kaiser was descended though a female and the OP through a male - and we mustn't be sexist about this.
The Medway thing is different.
Andrew Marr explains it well:
"The British in general do not make much of this (1688) invasion. Even quite well educated people believe that England has not been invaded since 1066. The impression has been left that William was more or less invited in, to sort out some constitutional issues. This was not so. "
Andrew Marr explains it well:
"The British in general do not make much of this (1688) invasion. Even quite well educated people believe that England has not been invaded since 1066. The impression has been left that William was more or less invited in, to sort out some constitutional issues. This was not so. "
ich "For small nations that have punched above their weight, the Dutch must take some beating." - Err no we are the ultimate small nation punching above our weight, the British Empire is the largest in history, almost double the size of the next largest. The Roman empire for example is 26th. The Dutch empire is 70th in the list:
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/List_ of_larg est_emp ires
I now welcome the 5C knockers.
https:/
I now welcome the 5C knockers.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.