Body & Soul1 min ago
The Hourglass
15 Answers
I've been thinking about hourglasses (don't ask!) according to an entry in wikipedia
https:/
Lying awake abed, all I could think of would be to construct the glass form with its narrow waist and open ended and starting at any given point in sunlight by using a marker's shadow, pour sand through it for exactly 24 hours, and then use one twenty fourth of that sand.
Or could there have been a better way?
https:/
Lying awake abed, all I could think of would be to construct the glass form with its narrow waist and open ended and starting at any given point in sunlight by using a marker's shadow, pour sand through it for exactly 24 hours, and then use one twenty fourth of that sand.
Or could there have been a better way?
Answers
1 to 15 of 15
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Perhaps the more contemporary name of "sand glass" gives another answer: it might not necessarily have been an hour that sand-glasses would keep the time for?
But I suspect your idea is probably reasonable. Time-keeping progresses from using the passage of the Sun (and Moon and stars) via sundials, then to more mechanical devices like water-clocks that were calibrated based on those astronomical movements, then onwards to even more mechanical devices in the Middle Ages. Each one can only be useful if it agrees with, and then improves on, the device before.
But I suspect your idea is probably reasonable. Time-keeping progresses from using the passage of the Sun (and Moon and stars) via sundials, then to more mechanical devices like water-clocks that were calibrated based on those astronomical movements, then onwards to even more mechanical devices in the Middle Ages. Each one can only be useful if it agrees with, and then improves on, the device before.
As a separate point, the 150 BC date for sand-glasses is disputed (although Wikipedia acknowledges this in the very same paragraph you quote from). On the other hand, water clocks existed since probably 1500BC or so, and sand-based hourglasses were definitely in use in the 1300s AD, and other sources express understandable doubt that nothing much of note in time-keeping happened between the two dates.
There's a few mentions of trial and error - but against what criterion?
I did first considered taking an hour from a sundial but making the judgement when to start and finish in a short period isn't going to be very accurate, maybe the first ones weren't, Wiki doesn't say how good they were if tested against a modern timepiece.
It does though say that sand wasn't the best material because of the variations in grain size and ground eggshell was sometimes used.
I did first considered taking an hour from a sundial but making the judgement when to start and finish in a short period isn't going to be very accurate, maybe the first ones weren't, Wiki doesn't say how good they were if tested against a modern timepiece.
It does though say that sand wasn't the best material because of the variations in grain size and ground eggshell was sometimes used.
Time-keeping in the ancient world is often a hodge-podge anyway. With only the Sun, Moon and Stars to go on initially, it was always bound to be. The problem is that the length of a day turns out to vary, the length of a month turns out to vary, and the length of a year isn't set in stone either -- and anyway, none of these really agrees with each other very well. There aren't 12 lunar months in a Solar year, and there are about four or five different "years" you can define, and there aren't a whole number of days in a month or hours in a day... it's just an unholy mess.
Anyway, what you can do (and what was probably done) is say that, "when the Sun rises, and then rises again, the time between those two instants is called 'a day'. We will divide that time in to twenty-four equal parts. We want to measure one of those equal parts." This (or using Noon = highest point the Sun reaches in the course of a day, or sunset) is probably what was done to start with.
Anyway, what you can do (and what was probably done) is say that, "when the Sun rises, and then rises again, the time between those two instants is called 'a day'. We will divide that time in to twenty-four equal parts. We want to measure one of those equal parts." This (or using Noon = highest point the Sun reaches in the course of a day, or sunset) is probably what was done to start with.
Sextant (and before that a cross staff), essentially when you think it is approaching noon you measure the height of the sun above the horizon until the angle starts to reduce and declare the time at the highest point to be noon. In the words of the Captain 'make it noon', this allows you to know your latitude as there were tables showing at what latitude the sun would be at x angle on y day. Once reliable chronometers had become available to enable you to know what time it was at your home base knowing the difference between local noon and home noon allowed you to work out your longitude and the world (navigationally speaking) was your oyster :-)
1 to 15 of 15
