ChatterBank2 mins ago
electricity
22 Answers
is anyone out there savvy enough in physics to ponder my invention, i call it an inverse heating element which is exactly what it sounds like a band of material that converts intense heat and light into electrical wattage?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by schonovic. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.my hypothesis is a circuit that starts with a 9volt battery to the inverse element band which rests in a campfire; while in the campfire increases the amperage proceding out of the campfire into a thicker cable to a transformer delivering its power to a load (which requires more than 9volts) then returning to the 9volt at a depleted wattage.the advantage being that we don't have to be a primative steam based civilization anymore and can go to space with less dificulty.
You see the device is beyond my understanding of physics hence i say is there anyone out there savvy enough in physics to ponder this. Thats what makes it a question because i don't know the answer. i do believe the definition of a question is one that gets an answer or comment/s and not another question.
There's a group that will answer your question fairly quickly if you repost in the Science section (it's 11 sections down from here). It's like Big Bang Theory in there sometimes... A lot of people only look at one or two topics sections on this page so the people who can answer you may have missed your question.
Good luck!
Good luck!
heathfield - it can't be a fuel cell that schonovic is describing. In a fuel cell the energy is converted directly from chemical energy to electrical energy. It does not use heat energy as an intermediate step. Don't get me wrong, they are a brilliant way of getting energy from a fuel, they just do not fit schonovic's description.
At the time of my previous post I thought thermopiles had efficiencies of a few percent. Then I found a tantalising reference to a nanotech conference in Houston next month where there is mention of "carbon tube thermopiles which conversion efficiency is currently estimated as about 40%". Unfortunately the abstract is not available when you follow the link.
(if you are interested, google "efficiency of thermopiles" and go to the www.ntsi.org link.)
(if you are interested, google "efficiency of thermopiles" and go to the www.ntsi.org link.)
I'm nearly crying with laughter here... to quote from schonvic's first reply on this thread
inverse element band which rests in a campfire........
......the advantage being that we don't have to be a primitive steam based civilization anymore and can go to space with less difficulty.
So get those campfires alight on the spaceships and away we go ;)
inverse element band which rests in a campfire........
......the advantage being that we don't have to be a primitive steam based civilization anymore and can go to space with less difficulty.
So get those campfires alight on the spaceships and away we go ;)
Back in the late '60s I was using electrical generators in remote parts of the world to supply charging power for battery-operated radio-location transmitters. These generators comprised 6 cells, each with a propane gas burner under them. These heat-to-electricity generating units were called ''fuel cells''.
All the latest literature on fuel cells only makes mention of flameless chemical conversions. The fact that the term was also applied to the older combustion fuel cells seems to have been forgotten by a later generation. The upshot is that Schonovic's idea is not new, and such a means of generating electricity has been used in the past.
All the latest literature on fuel cells only makes mention of flameless chemical conversions. The fact that the term was also applied to the older combustion fuel cells seems to have been forgotten by a later generation. The upshot is that Schonovic's idea is not new, and such a means of generating electricity has been used in the past.