ChatterBank1 min ago
Estoppel 2
Just a quick update
Sat with my solicitor today to prepare my defense he seems to think any money my ex husband spent is taken as both as I was looking at decree absolute
I did not understand this bit
Any property which or an interest in which is devised to the former spouse had died on the date on which the marriage is dissolved unless a contrary intention appeases in the will.
Sat with my solicitor today to prepare my defense he seems to think any money my ex husband spent is taken as both as I was looking at decree absolute
I did not understand this bit
Any property which or an interest in which is devised to the former spouse had died on the date on which the marriage is dissolved unless a contrary intention appeases in the will.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Tiger786. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Stay put, till you have an alternative home. Pay council tax etc where you are (welfare can help with exes). Your inlaws are acting dishonestly by insisting you register with HA for a secondary home while they kept you all this time & giving you & kids false hopes.
No court would let you be a burden on tax payers if there is a way out.
No court would let you be a burden on tax payers if there is a way out.
Tamborine Tiger has a legally served eviction notice she has to move out. If she stays as you say she will be forcefully evicted by baliffs. The in-laws have housed her free for 15 years , there is no way they are being dishonest by wanting the house back it is their house I would imagine they want their son , Tigers ex husband to have it.
Tiger has no tenancy agreement so she can't pay rent .
If Tiger has £16,000 (actually I think the sum mentioned was £13,000) then she has to use it as a deposit to get a private rented house.
You are giving her false hope where there is none.
Tiger has no tenancy agreement so she can't pay rent .
If Tiger has £16,000 (actually I think the sum mentioned was £13,000) then she has to use it as a deposit to get a private rented house.
You are giving her false hope where there is none.
Your inlaws & hubby misled/deceived you about inheriting your home. Since your divorce their promises have been withdrawn and left you & kids destitute and reliant on tax payers.
In a court, that would not look favourable on inlaws or OH, and worse that they encouraged you to cheat the system by applying for a secondary home (at TP expense) while you were married & securely occupied. Your inlaws promise jeopardised your OH from purchasing a home for you; of which you could have gained half value on divorce. Nontheless, your OH remains secure & could occupy said house if you vacate it. Courts are not daft, they will see the injustice here.
In a court, that would not look favourable on inlaws or OH, and worse that they encouraged you to cheat the system by applying for a secondary home (at TP expense) while you were married & securely occupied. Your inlaws promise jeopardised your OH from purchasing a home for you; of which you could have gained half value on divorce. Nontheless, your OH remains secure & could occupy said house if you vacate it. Courts are not daft, they will see the injustice here.
Tambo - with all due respect, you are talking out of the back of your head.
You have NO legal expertise and habitually confuse 'natural' justice with 'The Law'.
The good folks of AB who actually *do* know of which they speak have spent days explaining to the OP that she doesn't have a leg to stand on, and why. Your well-meaning posts only seem to confuse the OP be seeming to provide hope when, in fact, there is none.
Tiger - You need to accept that you will have to leave your house as some point in the near future and would be best served by putting all your energies into securing suitable accommodation for you and your children.
You have NO legal expertise and habitually confuse 'natural' justice with 'The Law'.
The good folks of AB who actually *do* know of which they speak have spent days explaining to the OP that she doesn't have a leg to stand on, and why. Your well-meaning posts only seem to confuse the OP be seeming to provide hope when, in fact, there is none.
Tiger - You need to accept that you will have to leave your house as some point in the near future and would be best served by putting all your energies into securing suitable accommodation for you and your children.
-- answer removed --
Tamborine have you been reading all this over the last few days?
The ex in-laws made the promise ( if they actually did as they and the ex husband all say it never happened) to their son and daughter in law as a couple. It has been made clear by all on here, including a fully qualified and practising Barrister ( Barmaid) that the promise, if it even existed , was rendered null and void on the divorce and that after divorce Tiger has no claim of any kind on the house. In the original question it was made clear that the in-laws had told Tiger that she could stay in the house while she was waiting to be rehoused. But Tiger has not bothered to apply for housing but instead has started this futile case to be given the entire house free due to 'estoppal'
The ex in-laws made the promise ( if they actually did as they and the ex husband all say it never happened) to their son and daughter in law as a couple. It has been made clear by all on here, including a fully qualified and practising Barrister ( Barmaid) that the promise, if it even existed , was rendered null and void on the divorce and that after divorce Tiger has no claim of any kind on the house. In the original question it was made clear that the in-laws had told Tiger that she could stay in the house while she was waiting to be rehoused. But Tiger has not bothered to apply for housing but instead has started this futile case to be given the entire house free due to 'estoppal'
Latest Posts
Crosswords1 min ago
Film, Media & TV19 mins ago
Road rules20 mins ago
I Can't Find A Santa Emoji Anywhere.
ChatterBank30 mins ago
