Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Accused of theft
I have been accused of theft from my employer, something I completely deny. I have not been charged however, I can see this happening due to circumstantial evidence. I look forward to my day in court. It has become apparent the police are missing the issues that can prove my innocence all be it I concede it is their job to help prove my guilt. They have not searched my work place fully or even close so realistically I have it in my mind that they can't say for sure things are missing. My 1st Q to them in court would be, have you searched, answer not fully. Then how do you know they are missing. Am I barking up the wrong tree here. The implication of being found guilty is huge, I will lose everything including children, home, wife, job, pension etc. Grateful for any help/guidence.
Answers
As I have said the company has not followed the correct procedure here at all , they should never have accused anyone of theft without a full physical check and stock take . I am certain that the company can not now proced with the accusation, they have already made such serious errors that the case could never go to court. I would definately now sue your company...
07:33 Fri 22nd Jul 2011
I am not trying to be evasive, I did not do it. My family circumstances are strained due to the stress of this. The fact that I have constantly placed my job before my family has not helped. I realise what I can lose and this scares me. This is most certainly the kick I needed to reprioritise my life if all goes well and the truth comes out. Thanks to all that have replied.
'It has become apparent the police are missing the issues that can prove my innocence' ... Do you have this evidence? Who does? What is the evidence? If something and you are not saying what has gone missing, it has to be somewhere... have your fellow colleagues been questioned? Why only you? Could amount to bullying? More details are needed...
-- answer removed --
I obviously misunderstood the way this board works. I was after some genuine advice. I was not intentionally being evasive. I gave you the facts. Other staff have been interviewed too however, I don't know what has been said. As for the flippent comments, I just hope you are never put in the same situation.
Hi ldon101- if you ask a question in a a serious section such as law then the people who can help you will need a lot more detail than you have provided. Lack of detail tends to indicate someone who hasn't told the truth or is leaving out key facts that would change the advice given. Seriously, if you want some decent advice, then you need to give the full facts (after all, your are, to all extents and purposes, anonymous on here).
-- answer removed --