ChatterBank0 min ago
My Rage To Cheating Fiancee Man
Ok do shooe down here,,, I recently discovered that my fiancee was seeing another man (her ex boss) i followed her one night and found them walking together so I gave him a good beating but whilst i was hitting him he kept saying to me hit me not my car, (I was in a state of rage and cant remember doing the following) after a short while punching him my he hid behind my fiancee and i know i dont hit girls so aparently i wen to his brand new BMW and started punching the car to the extent it had no glass, mirrors, lights, and all panels were dented causing £13k damage.
now after punching him and loosing my mind i can remember my fiancee shouting in my face i looked down to my hands and they was ripped to shreds blood everywhere! I do not recall walking to car smashing it or chasing him around it with a iron bar like he has said in statement.
i need advice on what to do now do I plead guilty to something I cant honestly remember? what could I expect in court to happen?
now after punching him and loosing my mind i can remember my fiancee shouting in my face i looked down to my hands and they was ripped to shreds blood everywhere! I do not recall walking to car smashing it or chasing him around it with a iron bar like he has said in statement.
i need advice on what to do now do I plead guilty to something I cant honestly remember? what could I expect in court to happen?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by r800atv. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Not remembering, for whatever reason, is no defence . If proof were needed a man called Gunther Podola said he couldn't remember, the Court of Appeal said it was no defence, and he was hanged; he'd shot a policeman; so a charge of damaging a car isn't answered by saying it.
You plainly remember enough. You cannot remember definitely not damaging the car but you remember his strange statement about hitting him and not his car. In a fit of rage against him, hearing that, the one thing you would do would be damage the car wouldn't it? The one thing he's asking you not to do would be the thing you would immediately do, to annoy him and hurt him further.
You plainly remember enough. You cannot remember definitely not damaging the car but you remember his strange statement about hitting him and not his car. In a fit of rage against him, hearing that, the one thing you would do would be damage the car wouldn't it? The one thing he's asking you not to do would be the thing you would immediately do, to annoy him and hurt him further.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
ok home from magestrate they are missing evedence from the damage car ie breakdown of costings.... court adjourned......
they have said if this is proven to be over 5k then this has to be delt with in crown court.
I do not understand why i cant remember I LOST IT i remember hitting him dont remember hitting him that hard to cause the bruises desribed on his statement and the car well according to his statement I was out to destroy and stopped almost like someone turning on a lightswitch, the one who put he could have been innocent, are you kidding me what would you have done if you found your partner with someone else (offer a beer and welcome him with open arms) I dont think so.
my solicitor has advised a no ple for now i just wondered if anyone slse has been through similar to get true advice not just silly comments
they have said if this is proven to be over 5k then this has to be delt with in crown court.
I do not understand why i cant remember I LOST IT i remember hitting him dont remember hitting him that hard to cause the bruises desribed on his statement and the car well according to his statement I was out to destroy and stopped almost like someone turning on a lightswitch, the one who put he could have been innocent, are you kidding me what would you have done if you found your partner with someone else (offer a beer and welcome him with open arms) I dont think so.
my solicitor has advised a no ple for now i just wondered if anyone slse has been through similar to get true advice not just silly comments
Hi r800atv
It is correct that criminal damage more often than not goes to the Crown Courts if the value of exceeds £5000, but some times this is not a bad thing. The value of damage is therefore required in evidence to proceed in these situations. (going to Crown Court is not necessarily a bad thing in these types of offences).
I take it you are not denying the allegations?
It is correct that criminal damage more often than not goes to the Crown Courts if the value of exceeds £5000, but some times this is not a bad thing. The value of damage is therefore required in evidence to proceed in these situations. (going to Crown Court is not necessarily a bad thing in these types of offences).
I take it you are not denying the allegations?
-- answer removed --
Latest Posts
Technology2 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
ChatterBank5 mins ago
ChatterBank10 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.