Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Trumps Latest
4 Answers
Hello readers - President Trump is given to lititgating
here is one
https:/
the idea is to bog the other side down with legal application - but here the other side is the American Govt.,
Trump has now applied to one of this repubican judges to intervene
https:/
Now.... the wife has appeared in front of the 6th Jan ctee and insisted that whatever she told the scarp the election crayzies - it was not to break the law
Mr Thomas has not stepped down from this case
Unlike Ld Hoffman in the Pinochet case - whose wifey was connnected to Amnesty International. The House of Lords had to hear an appeal on an appeal ( how day do dat then) and recused the Hoff.
Rules for recusal on judges are stricter than for the punters
what do ABers think
here is one
https:/
the idea is to bog the other side down with legal application - but here the other side is the American Govt.,
Trump has now applied to one of this repubican judges to intervene
https:/
Now.... the wife has appeared in front of the 6th Jan ctee and insisted that whatever she told the scarp the election crayzies - it was not to break the law
Mr Thomas has not stepped down from this case
Unlike Ld Hoffman in the Pinochet case - whose wifey was connnected to Amnesty International. The House of Lords had to hear an appeal on an appeal ( how day do dat then) and recused the Hoff.
Rules for recusal on judges are stricter than for the punters
what do ABers think
Answers
1 to 4 of 4
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Peter Pedant. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I’m no expert in US law, but Trump fought handing over his tax records all the way to the Supreme Court – I’m sure if there were a similar situation in the UK, he would have been refused appeal to a higher court based on the merits of his case.
Trump is in deep do-do; any other US citizen who had done half of what Trump has done would have been jailed a long time ago.
In relation to the 100s of secret documents seized from Ma- a-Largo, there was a report of a woman in Hawaii working for the secret service; apparently she took home a top secret document and notes she had made at a top secret meeting, for which she was jailed for 3 years - while trump had a mountain of secret documents.
Trump recently recruited a new lawyer to his team, paying a $3 Million retainer up front. He also recently launched a laughable lawsuit against CNN for $475 Million, the main basis of his claim being that CNN don’t like him.
If I were advising Trump, I would say it is coming close to the time he needs to identify some dodgy country that does not have an extradition treaty with the US, and live out his remaining days there.
Trump is in deep do-do; any other US citizen who had done half of what Trump has done would have been jailed a long time ago.
In relation to the 100s of secret documents seized from Ma- a-Largo, there was a report of a woman in Hawaii working for the secret service; apparently she took home a top secret document and notes she had made at a top secret meeting, for which she was jailed for 3 years - while trump had a mountain of secret documents.
Trump recently recruited a new lawyer to his team, paying a $3 Million retainer up front. He also recently launched a laughable lawsuit against CNN for $475 Million, the main basis of his claim being that CNN don’t like him.
If I were advising Trump, I would say it is coming close to the time he needs to identify some dodgy country that does not have an extradition treaty with the US, and live out his remaining days there.
Hi - me!
T has appealed to have it accelerated - the hearing
but used in the pleading the word "my possession" which is half the fight over unlawful carriage of documents.
Putting the "100 selected" back into the pool of 10 300 'others' - T thought was a master stroke but isnt.... because....they can now be seen by everyone and previously the 'selected' were private and classified and cd only be seen by a few - - - I think
T has appealed to have it accelerated - the hearing
but used in the pleading the word "my possession" which is half the fight over unlawful carriage of documents.
Putting the "100 selected" back into the pool of 10 300 'others' - T thought was a master stroke but isnt.... because....they can now be seen by everyone and previously the 'selected' were private and classified and cd only be seen by a few - - - I think
1 to 4 of 4
