Yes, but most of those who transferred their licences under the Transitional Arrangements chose to give up their "embedded conditions", particularly if they appeared to be restrictive to future business. There was a discussion at the time between notable Counsel (I wont name him but he has written a book on the Licensing Act) and DCMS about what it all meant and they never actually agreed about what embedded conditions were. It is clear that the previous (1964) Act had, under Section 166, a restriction on credit sales which specified
"(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, a person shall not in any licensed premises, licensed canteen or the premises of a registered club�
(a) himself or by his servant or agent sell or supply intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises, or
(b) consume intoxicating liquor, unless it is paid for before or at the time when it is sold or supplied...."
The 2003 Act redefined everything so there i now no such thing as intoxicating liquor (now alcohol), supply (there is now no requirement for a licence to supply), licensed canteens or registered clubs. It would therefore be impossible to retain the offence and carry it over to the new arangements.
The old Act has been completely repealed. The embedded conditions would only apply to licences which were converted within the timescales set down in Scehdule 8 to the 2003 Act and where the holders had not applied to remove them. In addition, all Premises Licences applied for and issued since November 2005 are not subject to the embedded conditions at all.
As a Council licensing lawyer and adviser to 2 Committees, I have officiated at over 500 licensing committee hearings and can say that, in no more than 20 cases, have I seen licences which make any reference to credit sales.
My original comments are therefore correct in relation to the original query.