News1 min ago
Top Gear - Highly Irresponsible Stunt
47 Answers
Anybody just seen the supermarket challenge with Clarkson et al driving their clapped out bangers around some supermarket floor, Clarkson not giving a damn about hitting the products all around the store, considerable damage being caused. Then Hammond repeats it, some staging of the 'collisions' and finishing with his VW(?) sliding over the finishing line on its side.
'Amusing' though it may be - some tozzer will go and try this out in real life, if not here, then in somewhere like the States or Canada (and there is a big programme following over there).
Your views............?
'Amusing' though it may be - some tozzer will go and try this out in real life, if not here, then in somewhere like the States or Canada (and there is a big programme following over there).
Your views............?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DTCwordfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
//The supermarket must have given permission, and be compensated for the inconvenience.// I agree on that boxie - the point is what happens if some of these mad petrol heads who love the programme try and replicate it in a supermarket without permission, thinking it to be a 'cool thing' to do, or whatever re bets/dares etc.
Don't like the stupidity of this programme but Hubby loves it and has it on .......... we missed this stunt having just got in. I can't get over seeing Lord Grantham from Downton looking so different! see my post ....... sorry DT didn't know you had already posted about Top Gear.
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Media-and-TV/Question1312138.html
http://
The joy of Top Gear is that they do things which we might like to do but know we can't. Are you seriously suggesting that someone will drive a car through a supermarket without thinking of the consequences and just because it was a stunt on Top Gear? Right. How many years jail do you think they'd get? Criminal damage is just the start of it. Criminal damage with intent to endanger life or being reckless whether life would be endangered? Yes. Dangerous driving? If the court holds that a supermarket is 'a public place', that too. Assault? Yes, assault can be reckless. And they wouldn't give any of that a thought?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.