Crosswords2 mins ago
Famous, Rich And Hungry
126 Answers
For those that are interested this is just starting on BBC 1.
Answers
Yes...it was handled more sensitively than I'd expected. I think lack of empathy is due to viewers feeling certain that it couldn't happen to them,that they would make better choices. Well,maybe they would...but nothing is so certain. Where I work we see a few victims of the current economic conditions,
22:31 Wed 12th Mar 2014
I agree that some people with problems are not the brightest - like the two with fines outstanding - but that woman wasn't stupid by any means - her accounts proved that - and even though she received less than all the others she was eating well because she was budgeting properly. I've no doubt that had the cameras not been there she would still have had the sense to contact the council.
I think that the people were chosen to show how different types of people cope with their crappy lives and to show how all sorts of people are affected. The lady in question did get very upset and without chivvying may well have put it off and things could have gotten worse, to her, the bank charges were astronomical and upset h carefully formulated budget. I think the programme did an excellent job of showing different types of struggling families, that all sorts of people struggle - not just perceived 'chavvy scum'c
'High on the hog', wasn't the best choice of words there. They'd be subsisting rather than living any kind of a decent life.
If there were 10 job vacancies for every unemployed person then low benefits might act as a spur to get them looking for work. There aren't, so low benefits seem to punish those least able to manage.
If there were 10 job vacancies for every unemployed person then low benefits might act as a spur to get them looking for work. There aren't, so low benefits seem to punish those least able to manage.
I think this episode did an excellent job. I felt particularly sorry for the man who worked as a security guard who had taken high cost loans - although I have to say I was a little disappointed that by the end of the programme he hadn't taken Theo's advice to declare himself bankrupt, so was still paying astronomical interest. His own worst enemy.
Naomi - Theo wasn't aware of that because it hasn't happened to him. You pay it and don't get it back. If things have gone badly enough and you are claiming benefits and have no assets already then you are exempt. The alternative is to wait for your creditors to make you bankrupt but apparently that is an unpleasant experience (not that declaring ourself bankrupt is a walk in the park).
Sherrard, if that man who was advised to declare himself bankrupt had defaulted on his debt repayment for a month instead of skinting himself to pay it, he would have had the money to pay the fee to declare himself bankrupt. The whole debt would then have been written off. There are ways.
//Must be nice to live in some people's world.//
Are you talking about me?
//Must be nice to live in some people's world.//
Are you talking about me?
Often the debts are built up before people go onto benefits. While they have a n income they can juggle finances and make some repayments, but once they have to rely on benefits the levels are not enough to cover the repayments so the debt spirals.
I think naomi is right to the extent that past debts and a lack of savings are often the root cause. I noted the same thing when i saw a programme about food banks- many seemed to have been brought down by longstanding and spiralling debts, previous drug or alcohol problems and no savings
I think naomi is right to the extent that past debts and a lack of savings are often the root cause. I noted the same thing when i saw a programme about food banks- many seemed to have been brought down by longstanding and spiralling debts, previous drug or alcohol problems and no savings
