Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 37 of 37rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
my post was in respect to - 'why the ankle tag'
i agree hc, conventional people don't drive when banned
am leaving this thread, too many "answer removed" for my liking :(
Baths
That's the trend. :-(
Question Author
/// As usual, this is only news because the subject is an actress. ///

That is blatantly obvious, just as what romper suit the Royal baby is wearing, or David Cameron falls down and bumps his knee.

/// Tune in next week for the mind-blowing revelation - The Rover's Return is not a real pub!!!!!' ///

/// Shockhorrorprobe!!!!! ///

As I previously said there is no need for sarcasm, please stick to the subject in question. Why bring in The Rover's Return, and try and belittle those that follow Coronation Street?

Just trying to keep this innocent media and TV thread on track you understand, so i don't think there is cause for you to press your 'Post Removed' button, this time.
You assume that posts on this thread are deleted by me.

Stop trying to pick a fight - it's not going to work anymore.
There is precious little information to go on. No details of her speed, why she was driving whilst banned and the child may well have undone the seatbelt itself.

To draw a conclusion as to whether the penalty is commensurate with the crime is for the judge and jury (if appropriate) who were presented with all the facts.
Trouble is, I've met loadsa nice people on here who have joined me on FB, where we are not censored. I use the F word, and even the C word on there, just because I can ;)

Baths
x x
Bathsheba - //Trouble is, I've met loadsa nice people on here who have joined me on FB, where we are not censored. I use the F word, and even the C word on there, just because I can ;)

Baths
x x //

This site is in its sixteenth year now - it started long before social media was the force it is today.

It is, and remains a family site, so ripe language is censored automatically - but posts are left as they are apart from that.

Posts are removed if they transgress Site Rules - going off-topic, or attempting to cause spats between AB'ers. That results in threads spinning into unpleasant exchanges, and for that reason they are taken out before they can develop further.

Hope that explains why the site runs as it does.
Ecclescake - //There is precious little information to go on. No details of her speed, why she was driving whilst banned and the child may well have undone the seatbelt itself.

Four of my five grandchildren are past the age of Ms' Weeks' child, and when they were that age - and indeed now - they knew not to unfasten a seatbelt until the car was stationary, and they had asked and been given permission - so I dout that is the case here, most parents and grandparents put the rules in place from day one.

It may be that the child was not secured in a proper car seat, which is an offence.
Feck, Bathy ... you? sweary words? surely that's Cobblers?
Yes thank you Andy, (hate these names in small print) you have explained things to me clearly and succinctly. However,I wasn't bemoaning the fact that I couldn't use bad language on here.

Baths
x x
Lol Talbot, you know well enough what I'm like ;)
Bathsheba - if your concern was about the deletion of some posts, I hope my explanation has proved sufficient there as well.

With regard to the small letters of my user name, it dates back to the start of the site, when everyone used their own name, and used lower case for uniformity. This predates the proliferation of witty user names which are seen across most social media sites today - as I advised, we started in 2000 - 'user names' were yet to appear.
Well we know the speed to be in excess of 50mph.The court knew she was driving whist disqualified. Usually it follows,or used to ,that a disqualified driver will not be insured. I noticed the CPS didn't pursue that one.The CPS are useless and will pursue the easiest course of action to them. If they can get a bit of plea bargaining arranged they may pursue just two of four potential driving offences.I cannot recall special conditions in law that allow a disqualified driver to disregard the suspension so that would stand. The speed was probably not disputed or challenged by the defendant.The others (offences) were not proeeded with.
Interesting points retrocop - and thus far, we still don't know why a curfew was imposed for a motoring offence - hopefully newjudge will be along to enlighten us.
She has no excuse for speeding, driving whilst banned, and transporting a minor without proper safety restraints. She wasn't even drunk.

21 to 37 of 37rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Me Thinks This Lady Got Off Too Lightly.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.