Question Author
Well....I have now watched the program, although I am not quite sure how I watched it to the very end to be honest.
I found Spencer to be one of the creepiest and most chilling persons that I have ever witnessed. There were times during the 80 minutes that he made my flesh literally creep.
Professor David Wilson came to his conclusion that Spencer is a psychopath, something that I had reached after the first 30 mins. Wilson said that Spencer was manipulative and he was definitely that, in spades. All those periods of crocodile tears didn't fool anybody.
There was one piece of evidence that stuck out for me. Spencer admitted that he did murder his friend Wilkes, about a year after Carl was shot, in exactly the same way, with a shotgun. He said that Wilkes had annoyed him, so he went out to his car, sawed the barrels off his shotgun with a hacksaw, and then went in again and killed Wilkes.
But why would he have taken the considerable trouble of sawing the barrels off the shotgun, when he could just have picked the gun up and shot him anyway ? I am not an expert in these matters but it can't have been easy to saw off the barrels of a shotgun.
I sincerely hope that the Police now re-interview everybody associated with the Carl Bridgewater case, including Spencer, and that they make a proper job of it this time, although why they didn't re-open the case after the 4 previously convicted men were released in 19997 is beyond my understanding.
Carl deserved some justice here.