Watching this programme for the second time today.......if I was there I would find it very hard NOT to slap Rob. He has just said he is willing to listen to everyone's opinion but is butting in every time someone speaks. I'm hoping he leaves today cause I don't think I can stand hearing his voice over everyone else's.........
Indeed, Rob is so obnoxious and dominates the procedure, what a "know all" who is not as clever as he tries to make out. I am now rooting for kindly Arthur.
not quite sure what the function of the breaks are - as no one gets voted off as a result of the discussions
I think that there is a flaw in the design - as the questions have a right answer and jury discussion aint gonna change that ( whereas in a real jury - it does find fact and the fact is then 'true' as it has been found by a jury )
so for .... which american state flag has a union flag on it ?
no amount of discussion will change the fact that the correct answer is Hawaii ( used to be a british colony AND an independent country )
there is astounding ignorance - the A level history student didnt know when the declaration of independence was 1776 not when the treaty of Paris was 1783....