I most definitely will not deny that many people live in poverty in this country but I do sometimes question the criteria by which some authorities define 'poverty'.
For example, I read in a Kent newspaper that children were regarded as living in poverty by the local authority if they lived in a home without central heating. That seems an odd criterion to use as
(a) a child living in a baronial hall, with servants tending to roaring log fires while they tucked into roast boar would, by that measure, be seen as 'living in poverty' ; and
(b) unless you count halls of residence during my student days, I've never lived anywhere with central heating and I definitely wouldn't want to do so. (I've got a friend who pays his financial advisers large amounts of money to manage his offshore accounts, so he's obviously not short of a bob or two, but he never uses the central heating in his house).