Do You Think I Would Be Taking The ***...
Jobs & Education1 min ago
https:/
They are talking about this incident.
AH: "No-one goes from a bar in a theatre or a sports stadium, and gets on a plane. Again your logic is baseless." - not my logic, yours, you said:
If you want to drink, go to a pub.If you want to travel on a plane, go to an airport. ....
Is that not saying that the primary function of each item is all it should do? I was following your "logic".
We ain't flying the plane ourselves, I don't accept your belief that we should curtail the enjotment opf the masses for a few morons. That's still my position
TTT - //
AH: "No-one goes from a bar in a theatre or a sports stadium, and gets on a plane. Again your logic is baseless." - not my logic, yours, you said:
If you want to drink, go to a pub.If you want to travel on a plane, go to an airport. ....
Is that not saying that the primary function of each item is all it should do? I was following your "logic". //
Not at all.
Flying by plane involves safety rules - no-one would consider, or be allowed, to travel without wearing seat belts.
I simply believe that minimising the potential for catastophe is a sensible way to approach anything, including travel.
// We ain't flying the plane ourselves, I don't accept your belief that we should curtail the enjotment opf the masses for a few morons. That's still my position. //
I accept it, and we must agree to differ.
retrocop - // Might as well close the umpteen bars on a cruise liner as well. That would be fun between port arrivals.
//That's bizarre reaching for a comparison, even for you.
Do you seriously think you can compare a few hundred people and maybe a dozen crew on a tube in the air, where air pressure exacerbates the effect of alcohol.
With what is effectively a sixteen storey floating hotel with six thousand people and four thousand crew that disembarkes its passengers at around nine in the morning after a good night's sleep, where the bars are not open until mid-morning at the earliest.
If you think those two equate in the slightest, then clearly you are not a regular traveller on either.//
Not bizarre. Some Cruise companies often advertise that booze is available on a 'all inclusive basis' as well as the food. You are not trying to tell us that cruise passengers do not get inebriated on board ships and become a total boor. Booze is sold on board as a profit making business as well as on flights and airport departure lounges. Are you not aware that passengers have gone MOB due to excess alcohol on board ships which necessitate a reverse course,delays etc etc.A cruise ship would be damn boring if Horlicks and cocoa was on offer during the day's entertainment and no bars. God they no longer do *** shooting off the taff rail. No way thanks.I enjoy the odd snifter and would not have a pious charlatan dictate when I could or not enjoy a drink just because they were stupid and overdo the rum at some party in their youth years ago. I have flown and have cruised. My cruising experience was in my own vessel with a well stocked 'ships store.'
retrocop - //Not bizarre. Some Cruise companies often advertise that booze is available on a 'all inclusive basis' as well as the food. You are not trying to tell us that cruise passengers do not get inebriated on board ships and become a total boor. //
No, I'm not trying to tell you that, which is probably why it's not in my post.
// Booze is sold on board as a profit making business as well as on flights and airport departure lounges. Are you not aware that passengers have gone MOB due to excess alcohol on board ships which necessitate a reverse course,delays etc etc. //
I am aware of that - but inappropriate, even fatal, behaviour can happen in any hotel, including floating ones, so that's hardly a valid reason to stop selling alcohol on board a cruise ship.
The instances of passengers lost overboard for any reason is a fraction of the air rage incidents that occur, and if you compare the number of passengers on a plane to the number of passengers on a large cruise liner, the chances become incompatable on a statistical basis.
//I enjoy the odd snifter and would not have a pious charlatan dictate when I could or not enjoy a drink just because they were stupid and overdo the rum at some party in their youth years ago. //
As far as I am concerned, we are exchanging views on a subject on which we differ - I do not feel the need to throw out nasty personal insults at you, simply because you think differently to me.
But if you can't resist the urge to be offensive - please try and ensure that your insults are more accurate than your comparisons.
pious
devoutly religious.
charlatan
a person falsely claiming to have a special knowledge or skill.
Since I am an atheist, it would be impossible for me to be pious, and I am not claiming any specific knowledge or skill, simply expressing a viewpoint.
Perhaps in future, you could offer comparisons that a hope of standing up even to casual scrutiny.
And if you must be rude - and experience shows that you must - try using a dictionary before you spit out your nasty insults, then you might be within the ballpark of getting your rudeness to be somewhere near accurate.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.