Donate SIGN UP

Has Grayling Gone Far Enough?

Avatar Image
TWR | 08:00 Mon 06th Mar 2017 | Motoring
18 Answers
It seems that the £200 + 6 points has not deterred people from using their Mobiles whilst driving, should it be £1000 & an instant ban?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by TWR. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It might be best to see how it goes after a period of time.
The penalties only changed on the first of March and it's obvious that those who flout the law aren't the quickest on the uptake.
There's a degree of hysteria around the subject that doesn't help either.
I think 6 points is enough but the fine should be higher.
There's already a thread regarding 6 pints somewhere.
Not gone far enough, I recommend that anyone using a possible lethal weapon of mass destruction ( a mobile phone whilst driving) their vehicle should be impounded & destroyed, after all we have all had enough warnings & it would appear to no avail.
good idea, anything to deter these morons from causing chaos.
lethal weapon of mass destruction

well, that'd be the car. Phones don't seem to kill anyone even though I try to hit people very hard with them. Maybe if I used it to choke them...
Of the 88 deaths caused by distractions in 2012, 17 were due to mobile use.
Department for Transport.

can't seem to get more uptodate stats but sure someone can.
Should be the same as drink driving, an instant ban and fine.
A life time driving ban.
All Traffic Police should immediately be issued with a MOBILE TELEPHONE MILL which would be used to mince offenders phones into 4 millimetre particles. The device would be manually operated via a large cranked handle and be similar to a kitchen mincer, only bigger. To facilitate it's use at the roadside it would need to be firmly clamped to the roof of the offenders car through an open door using a powerful CAM and LEVER, the specially HOBBED FINISH of the HARDEND STEEL GRIP PADS causing considerable damage to the roof lining inside and leaving a dent and damaged paint on the exterior. A DELIVERY CHUTE would direct the telephone remains into the footwell of the car.
These relatively cheap devices would save a fortune in paperwork and the "badge of shame" they inflicted onto the vehicle would in time have more effect than paltry fines...
nope, needs to be instant ban like DD + hefty fine. Bit more death and destruction will be necessary before they change the law to what it should be.
RobNorth, Genius!
What about smoking and driving? My OH nearly killed us years ago when he dropped his burning cigarette onto his boy's parts and he started leaping about.
you see less people smoking in cars, than those who use their phones.
Bit more death and destruction will be necessary before they change the law to what it should be.

ie all these terrible things that are supposed to happen... haven't.
I know it is against the law to use your phone even when you are stationary in a traffic jam which incidentally is ridiculous. However what if you turned your engine off and put your handbrake on in said traffic jam, could I then use my phone?
Question Author
You would have to "prove" that the car WAS SWITCHED off Dave.
Surely I would have to prove it was switched on. Innocent till proven guilty and all that?

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Has Grayling Gone Far Enough?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.