Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Smoking At The Wheel.
Do you think the dangers of smoking whilst driving are sufficient to warrant a ban ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by derekpara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
10ClarionSt, not banned, but people have been fined for eating at the wheel – even when their vehicle was stationary.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 06669/D river-p ay-145- eating- banana- wheel.h tml
http://
Yes it should be banned!
I have seen a newspaper report of a fatal car crash where the reason was that the driver was smoking at the wheel and dropped the lighted cigarette onto their lap where it started to burn their clothes.
It is already illegal to smoke in a car with a child (under 16) as a passenger , this applies to other passengers as well as the driver.
I have seen a newspaper report of a fatal car crash where the reason was that the driver was smoking at the wheel and dropped the lighted cigarette onto their lap where it started to burn their clothes.
It is already illegal to smoke in a car with a child (under 16) as a passenger , this applies to other passengers as well as the driver.
Accidents have been caused by drivers smoking. Smoking was a factor in this fatal accident:
http:// www.mir ror.co. uk/news /uk-new s/fatal -moment s-lorry -driver -smokes -946542 6
Fumbling for the cigarette pack, lighter and lighting up are all distractions. A dropped cigarette causes a panic as does a discarded cigarette blowing back in through the window it was thrown out of.
http://
Fumbling for the cigarette pack, lighter and lighting up are all distractions. A dropped cigarette causes a panic as does a discarded cigarette blowing back in through the window it was thrown out of.
Of course it's a distraction. Looking for the fag packet, finding the lighter, watching out for the ash that might fall, stubbing the thing out or chucking it out of the window with the risk that it might come back in and burn someone.
Yes, there are also distractions by changing the radio channel, eating sweets, chatting etc. but what's wrong with banning the smoking one for a start?
Yes, there are also distractions by changing the radio channel, eating sweets, chatting etc. but what's wrong with banning the smoking one for a start?
Clov, from getting into the car to driving the thing there are lots of distractions, talking on hands free, more often now the radio can be changed by a Toggle on the steering wheel, Dropping the window, I can understand the concern but it's getting out of hand, something on your mind, did I check the oil / water / tyres / can I miss that pot hole, that's a point, can we start a post about Pot holes? Sorry for diverting your post Derek.
Unless you drop your fag onto your crotch area I don't think smoking is as much of a distraction as using a hand-held mobile phone, and there are probably enough laws to cover 'insufficient control of a motor vehicle' if lighting up on the move.
On a personal note, I hate being in a smoker's car and consider it dangerous to light up or drive with one hand on the wheel whilst the other is holding the fag out of the window.
Thanks for your opinions.
D
On a personal note, I hate being in a smoker's car and consider it dangerous to light up or drive with one hand on the wheel whilst the other is holding the fag out of the window.
Thanks for your opinions.
D
I can't see how a ban would be Policed ?
We have lots of existing motoring laws, like wearing seat belts, not using hand held devices, not smoking in cars with young children and as far as I can see, these are widely ignored, speeding in built-up areas, etc.
So what would be the point of have another unenforceable law ?
We have lots of existing motoring laws, like wearing seat belts, not using hand held devices, not smoking in cars with young children and as far as I can see, these are widely ignored, speeding in built-up areas, etc.
So what would be the point of have another unenforceable law ?