Donate SIGN UP

which is best

Avatar Image
larkie1066 | 01:02 Fri 15th Sep 2006 | Motoring
7 Answers
is it better to buy a car that is younger but has more miles on the clock or a car with less miles but is older ?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by larkie1066. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I am not an expert in these matters, but I think most of the wear in an engine is while it is being started up from cold. So a car that does two miles a day going to work and back would be more worn for the mileage. Police cars for example are sold at high mileage, but they have rarely cooled down, and have been well maintained.
-- answer removed --
I bought a young one with low miles. Result.
depends on the make of car, if its a quality one (i.e. BMW , Merc ) then high miles don't matter
Expanding on Grunty's answer: if it has high miles, but with a full service history, then the high mileage isn't really a problem. Cars are designed and made to do this. No service history - be careful!
Taking a broad view and depending on time range............

A younger car with high mileage will have better specifications and be more economical.

An older car with low mileage will have lower specifications and be less economical.
If you don't want it as a status symbol,then,if you have a friend who knows owt about cars,look for a banger for a couple of hundred quid with a good MOT,and keep changing it. Other alternative is to get one as new as possible with a service history,personally I would shy away from those about 6yr old costing around �6.000

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

which is best

Answer Question >>