Crosswords1 min ago
insurance claim
I recently hit an illegally and badly parked car while swerving to avoid an object.Will I be liable for a claim against me?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by suemor7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your liability (or lack of it) to pay for damage to someone else's property is based upon the concept of 'negligence'.
If a court was asked to rule on who should pay for the repairs, it would have to assess whether it occurred solely because of your negligence. If it was satisfied that this was so, you would be held liable for the full costs of repairs.
However, if the court decided that the damage occurred partially because of the negligence of the other driver (through parking badly) it could decide that he was responsible for paying a certain percentage of the total repair costs (including any repairs to your own vehicle).
I disagree with Grunty. The minimum insurance required by law is 'third party' which includes all claims for loss or damage suffered by a third party. Therefore, any claim against you can be referred to your insurers. It will be up to them to decide whether it's worth their while contest the degree of liability.
Chris
If a court was asked to rule on who should pay for the repairs, it would have to assess whether it occurred solely because of your negligence. If it was satisfied that this was so, you would be held liable for the full costs of repairs.
However, if the court decided that the damage occurred partially because of the negligence of the other driver (through parking badly) it could decide that he was responsible for paying a certain percentage of the total repair costs (including any repairs to your own vehicle).
I disagree with Grunty. The minimum insurance required by law is 'third party' which includes all claims for loss or damage suffered by a third party. Therefore, any claim against you can be referred to your insurers. It will be up to them to decide whether it's worth their while contest the degree of liability.
Chris
You should be in sufficient control of your car not to hit an obstacle in the road however badly parked it might be.
Suppose it had been a child and not a car!
It would probably be different if the object came off of a vehicle in front of you in which case it would probably be the fault of that person but in general you're expected to drive in such a way as to be able to cope with an unforeseen obstacle.
Although it must be said that in practice few of us do all the time.
Suppose it had been a child and not a car!
It would probably be different if the object came off of a vehicle in front of you in which case it would probably be the fault of that person but in general you're expected to drive in such a way as to be able to cope with an unforeseen obstacle.
Although it must be said that in practice few of us do all the time.
Hard as it may seem it's a difficult position to be in if you're trying to say that a stationary vehicle, skip, or whatever was to blame for you not being in sufficient control to avoid it.
Certainly sounds as though you were the one to cause the damage, so yes, your insurance company will probably have to stump up.
Certainly sounds as though you were the one to cause the damage, so yes, your insurance company will probably have to stump up.
sorry-should have been clearer-the object I was avoiding was a sudden movement in front of the bonnet of the parked car and when i instinctively braked, my car skidded slightly on the wet road and hit the car which as wellas being illegally parked was parked a good 18 inches out from the kerb. the movement turned out to be a pigeon yet it could as easily have been a child but my view of the kerb and pavement was blocked by the car.