Shopping & Style1 min ago
Rapists could have their sentences halved if they admit to their crime?
What's that all about?
Is Ken Clarke on this planet?
so, we have over populated prisons in this country but releasing this type of person back into the community after only serving half the term is total madness
Is Ken Clarke on this planet?
so, we have over populated prisons in this country but releasing this type of person back into the community after only serving half the term is total madness
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
The scumbag who did this on Monday wants locking up for a longer time not shorter
http://menmedia.co.uk...-way-home-from-school
http://menmedia.co.uk...-way-home-from-school
Sqad - you have to see that a consensual sex session turning out badly is a million miles (there's that phrase again!) from a man who attacks and violates a total stranger.
Because of the social and exual tabboos woven into this dreadful crime, it is difficult for an innocent man to receive a fair trial, or for an assaulted woman to feel that she has received proper justiice without the overwhemlimg feeling that the legal process has simply emotionally assaulted her all over again.
As i think you admit with you last post to jack - your premise is on pretty shaky ground!
Because of the social and exual tabboos woven into this dreadful crime, it is difficult for an innocent man to receive a fair trial, or for an assaulted woman to feel that she has received proper justiice without the overwhemlimg feeling that the legal process has simply emotionally assaulted her all over again.
As i think you admit with you last post to jack - your premise is on pretty shaky ground!
A fair point sqd - one of the drawbacsk of written communication!
i think i should have clarified my point by adding that although a number of men view rape as a woman's fantasy, that in no way entitles any man to decide to act it out for her unless he has received her express consent in advance, and they have an agreed code word so she can stop him at any time.
i think i should have clarified my point by adding that although a number of men view rape as a woman's fantasy, that in no way entitles any man to decide to act it out for her unless he has received her express consent in advance, and they have an agreed code word so she can stop him at any time.
it's an absolute legal minefield proving rape or not. I found this interesting site on Google when I typed in 'aggravated assault vs Rape'
http://www.prisontalk...owthread.php?t=482086 Ron.
http://www.prisontalk...owthread.php?t=482086 Ron.
Blame the criminal justice system which not only allows "plea bargaining", but also allows "tariffs" to dictate length of sentence instead of adhering to the letter of the law.
When all factors are taken into consideration and mitigation, the original charges are very often lost in a welter of legal arguments and thousands of words from hordes of legal eagles who are the only ones who usually gain from these things.
Clarke is reflecting an already dangerous and worrying system which is so out of control that so called natural justice is rarely achieved. I would strongly advise anyone who has never been to a court of law to try to do so - it's more like a soap opera than a bastion of public service where justice is meant to be meted out.
When all factors are taken into consideration and mitigation, the original charges are very often lost in a welter of legal arguments and thousands of words from hordes of legal eagles who are the only ones who usually gain from these things.
Clarke is reflecting an already dangerous and worrying system which is so out of control that so called natural justice is rarely achieved. I would strongly advise anyone who has never been to a court of law to try to do so - it's more like a soap opera than a bastion of public service where justice is meant to be meted out.
I quite agree but on the other hand what about the innocent ones who have pleaded their innocence from day one and then found guilty on shaky cicumstantial evidence and Not identified by the victim where does that leave them 15+ years for being innocent and no parole because they are not admitting to the crime that they. Didnt commit
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.