Donate SIGN UP

Rapists could have their sentences halved if they admit to their crime?

Avatar Image
Bobbisox | 09:17 Wed 18th May 2011 | News
34 Answers
What's that all about?
Is Ken Clarke on this planet?
so, we have over populated prisons in this country but releasing this type of person back into the community after only serving half the term is total madness
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 34rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
My view is that rapists should have their bo11ocks chopped off, so if we halve their sentence we only chop one off - that'll teach the feckers
As I understand it, the proposal is that if a rapist admits guilt thus sparing the victim the trauma of making a court appearance, then the sentence would be more lenient.
Question Author
I think most people would agree with that WY x
bloody hell, AB is soooo slow today, takes a long time to open an answer
It's the new glue on the envelope Bobbs
Just demonstrates how out of touch with the peoples opinions the government is IMO.
I'm a live and let live kind of guy but rape is a crime of the soul. Hang them high.
Question Author
it is WY :+)

I just saw the bit on Sky News McM, never saw them add that, anything that spares the victims trauma has to be good but the should double the sentence in the first place then when an admission comes, give them the original one as it will have been halved...job done :o)
Question Author
agree with CT
I think there are a couple of ways at looking at this.....
Presently, the conviction rate for Rape cases is depressingly low. The majority of victims have to undergo the harrowing ordeal of a rape trial only to see their attacker acquitted because the very nature of the crime, in the majority of cases, is "he said, she said".

Whilst the ideal situation in 'every' rape case ought to be a conviction and be followed by a hefty prison sentence, perhaps some of the victims would rather have it acknowledged, in court, that they were violated and see the person responsible serve some time in prison, rather than walk away scot-free at the end of a lengthy trial ?
I agree Bobbi. The trouble with rape is it often so difficult to prove, if the rapist denies it and it cant be proved he walks away to do the same again, if he admits it and gets half the sentence he has maybe learned a lesson.

Personally I think there should be an option, a reduced sentence and castrate them, especially for child molesters.
A good point jack.

Even in our so-called 'enightened' soceity, there is still a massive stigma attatched to rape. Some meen still perceive it as a woman's fantasy, some women believe that a raped woman must have 'asked for it' - and the truth is of cvourse a million miles away.

If we could educate young people that rape is nothing to do with sex, it might be a way to shift attitudes away from the sexual connotations that rape has because it involves intercourse, even though that is involuntary.

We shouold start putting rape in its proper context - it's not about sex, it's about control and violation - it's robbery with violence.

Time will tell if the new approach works - it is an impossible moral dilema, and the hanging brigade - as usual - bring nothing useful to the debate.
Andy:

<<Even in our so-called 'enightened' soceity, there is still a massive stigma attatched to rape. Some meen still perceive it as a woman's fantasy, some women believe that a raped woman must have 'asked for it' - and the truth is of cvourse a million miles away. >>>>

Unfortunately not a" million miles" away..........some women, I don't know how many, DO indeed fantasise about being raped and do ask their partners to enact the rape scene, but please don't ask for "links" as this is purely a personal opinion based upon life experiences.

I am against the new proposal as the true rapist will have his sentence halved and the "contentious" case, innocent person, may have to plead guilty or take his chance in a court.
There is a world of difference between a consensual 'Force fantasy' and rape; don't you remember the conversation last time, sqad ?

Naturally, any innocent man should plead 'Not Guilty'; the odds are stacked that he will be found thus in any case....
sqad, I think you're missing the fundamental difference in asking for your partner to act out a kinky rape scene and being raped.. it's that word ^ there!
Why not double the sentence if they do not admit it.
ah that worked in the top box, the difference is 'asking' in case you didn't work it out!
JTH

<<<<Naturally, any innocent man should plead 'Not Guilty'; the odds are stacked that he will be found thus in any case....>>>

Maybe!

Yes I do remember the conversation of last time...........but if a "kinky sex" session turned "awkward" then she could cry rape.

My answer was basically aimed at Andy's comment in his initial paragraph that a raped woman must have asked for it being "a million miles " from the truth.
I agree that reducing the sentence for a guilty plea could have benefits of more convictions, not fewer. However, I thought it was already the case that judges could impose longer sentences on people who pleaded innocent and were found guilty. So I'm not sure what's different about this proposal, apart from the shorter sentence ...

There was another case recently (not rape, but still a violent assault) which highlighted the use of the Home Detention Curfew (http://www.bournemouthecho....frenzied_attack__reeased_after_ten_weeks):


>> A Prison Services spokesman said: “We taken the safety of the public extremely seriously. A home detention curfew is available to low risk prisoners serving sentences of more than three months and less than four years, who are deemed appropriate for early release. “To be placed on HDC, a prisoner must have served a quarter of their sentence and spent a minimum of 30 days in prison.”

So if somebody was going to get six years for rape (i.e. longer than average), had it halved to three years, then qualified for HDC, they could be out in only nine months. That mustn't be allowed to happen ...
sqad - Your premise is based on a consensual situation turning 'bad'.........Andy's comments refer more to people who have 'limited' intimacy prior to an attack.....

Short skirt ?.......asking for it.

Walking home alone ? .....asking for it.

Accepting a drink from a virtual stranger ? ......asking for it.
JTH...OK!

1 to 20 of 34rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Rapists could have their sentences halved if they admit to their crime?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.