ChatterBank1 min ago
BBC to apologise.
16 Answers
http://www.dailymail....r-Panorama-expos.html
The Daily Mail is often accused of telling lies, but here is our national broadcaster daring to include fake footage in their prestigious TV programme Panorama.
Makes one wonder how many of these heart wrenching scenes of the third world are also fake, and are used for propaganda purposes?
The Daily Mail is often accused of telling lies, but here is our national broadcaster daring to include fake footage in their prestigious TV programme Panorama.
Makes one wonder how many of these heart wrenching scenes of the third world are also fake, and are used for propaganda purposes?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.doubt it. But they are staffed by many left wing ideologists, who have their own agenda, anti Tory certainly. It has been pointed out in any number of papers, about the BBC's coverage of political events, probably as boring as it comes, but little coverage of the tories, but plenty for labour, and seeing as how i have to shell out a small fortune a year to keep these people in business the least than can do is be objective
Here's the actual report if your interested in reading it yourself and making your own mind up.
http://www.google.com...IPt94aPaIy5xA&cad=rja
http://www.google.com...IPt94aPaIy5xA&cad=rja
From the Guardian
// It goes against natural justice to find against the journalist and producers on what it calls "the balance of probabilities."
Dan McDougall is an intrepid, award-winning investigative reporter with a superb record in exposing human rights violations.
Frank Simmonds is an experienced producer who has been responsible for many important revelatory Panorama programmes.
Yet this so-called judgment - which requires the corporation to apologise for the documentary - puts a black mark against their names on the most tenuous of grounds. //
A Black mark ! These people should never be alowed to produce another item for television.
// It goes against natural justice to find against the journalist and producers on what it calls "the balance of probabilities."
Dan McDougall is an intrepid, award-winning investigative reporter with a superb record in exposing human rights violations.
Frank Simmonds is an experienced producer who has been responsible for many important revelatory Panorama programmes.
Yet this so-called judgment - which requires the corporation to apologise for the documentary - puts a black mark against their names on the most tenuous of grounds. //
A Black mark ! These people should never be alowed to produce another item for television.
how many other times has this happened ? highly unlikely to have been the first or the last
I'm sure the BBC has done this on untold occasions to back up its left wing biased reporting.
The BBC should be fined to teach them a lesson if thats possible.
And the fine should be a refund or a reduction on the licence tax.
I'm sure the BBC has done this on untold occasions to back up its left wing biased reporting.
The BBC should be fined to teach them a lesson if thats possible.
And the fine should be a refund or a reduction on the licence tax.
Ah the old left wing BBC - So symptomatic of the Right wing press thats led by Johnny foriegner to continualy attack it as such.
The BBC is the most maligned organisation due to its efforts to tell the truth.
So I ask you give one example of left wing bias by the BBC not something that shows the Labour party in a good light but something that advocaes the left as right when you can prove directly they are wrong.
The BBC is run by the most anti-liberal people in the country, the people who moved to Manchester despite opposition from all political fronts.
It does suprise me that the Xenophobes on here are quite happy to support the party line of an Australian led media company. So rather that belive the evidence of your own eyes you support a foriegner.
The BBC is the most maligned organisation due to its efforts to tell the truth.
So I ask you give one example of left wing bias by the BBC not something that shows the Labour party in a good light but something that advocaes the left as right when you can prove directly they are wrong.
The BBC is run by the most anti-liberal people in the country, the people who moved to Manchester despite opposition from all political fronts.
It does suprise me that the Xenophobes on here are quite happy to support the party line of an Australian led media company. So rather that belive the evidence of your own eyes you support a foriegner.