Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Tottenham Riot
Just watching Sky news atm and seeing the aftermath of rioting tonight, has anyone else seen it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by daisya. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Redhelen, thank you. Supports what I said.
I am not condoning this behaviour as I believe it will not solve anything. But if black people think an injustice was done then they will riot.
All we want to know is, what happened with the guy that was shot.
Did he have a gun?? We only have the police's word.
Who shot first??
Family are saying he was not a gangster and just a family man whether he was or not I cannot say. But it seems the family have not been told anything at all and quite rightly they want answers.
I am not condoning this behaviour as I believe it will not solve anything. But if black people think an injustice was done then they will riot.
All we want to know is, what happened with the guy that was shot.
Did he have a gun?? We only have the police's word.
Who shot first??
Family are saying he was not a gangster and just a family man whether he was or not I cannot say. But it seems the family have not been told anything at all and quite rightly they want answers.
That's what the IPCC are there for and the results of their inquiry won't be submitted overnight and nor should it. We do want transparency in such cases after all, don't we?
If initial witness accounts are anything to go by the image of him being a 'family man' are going to be somewhat difficult to sustain, as I don't know many family men who would allegedly carry a gun and use it against Police when confronted.
Do you?
Let's just wait for the IPCC report, as the local community ought to have done instead of carrying out wanton criminal activity.
If initial witness accounts are anything to go by the image of him being a 'family man' are going to be somewhat difficult to sustain, as I don't know many family men who would allegedly carry a gun and use it against Police when confronted.
Do you?
Let's just wait for the IPCC report, as the local community ought to have done instead of carrying out wanton criminal activity.
funnygirl
This tells you something of Mark Duggan, and how he was shot.
http://www.dailymail....don-cab-shootout.html
This tells you something of Mark Duggan, and how he was shot.
http://www.dailymail....don-cab-shootout.html
Gromit I think you have made my point riots have taken place under every government but it was only under Labour that the unions were able to bring this country to a standstill and would do so again if given the chance.
Didn't Brown appeal to the Unite and Cabin crew to show some common sense
And who last week said Labour Got It Wrong? Your leader Ed Miliband.
A man who could make a good prime minister if the unions and the lefties let him
Didn't Brown appeal to the Unite and Cabin crew to show some common sense
And who last week said Labour Got It Wrong? Your leader Ed Miliband.
A man who could make a good prime minister if the unions and the lefties let him
Gromit // I remember
Toxteth (1981)
Brixton 1 (1981)
Brixton 2 (1985)
Handsworth 1 (1981)
Handsworth 2 (1985)
Handsworth 3 (1991)
Moss Side (1981)
Strangeways (1990)
Trafalgar Square (1990)
Broadwater Farm (1985)
Bristol (1980)
Leeds (1981)//
Tottenham 2011
Most Labour councils and MPs Coincidence ?
Toxteth (1981)
Brixton 1 (1981)
Brixton 2 (1985)
Handsworth 1 (1981)
Handsworth 2 (1985)
Handsworth 3 (1991)
Moss Side (1981)
Strangeways (1990)
Trafalgar Square (1990)
Broadwater Farm (1985)
Bristol (1980)
Leeds (1981)//
Tottenham 2011
Most Labour councils and MPs Coincidence ?
"Why do people have to make such a fuss over the police assasinating a community leader? "
Because he was carrying an illegal firearm. Being a 'community leader' (which to be quite honest I have not read anywhere so I'd like to know where you got that from) doesn't allow you to do that.
Obviously we don't know the facts about the Duggan shooting yet, so we can't make calls on it. But I'm pretty sure I can say with confidence that even though it's far from unheard of for the police to kill civilians, police officers who use their firearms don't do it because they get off on killing people - which is what you'd think from the way they're described sometimes. Each time they've done it, it does seem to have been out of a genuine perception - sometimes wrong - that whoever they were targetting was a threat of some kind. As yet, we have no way of knowing whether the perception in this case was correct and it kind of depresses me that people refuse to see the ambiguities in the situation and immediately decide to side themselves against (or for) the police for no reason other than that's what they normally do.
Because he was carrying an illegal firearm. Being a 'community leader' (which to be quite honest I have not read anywhere so I'd like to know where you got that from) doesn't allow you to do that.
Obviously we don't know the facts about the Duggan shooting yet, so we can't make calls on it. But I'm pretty sure I can say with confidence that even though it's far from unheard of for the police to kill civilians, police officers who use their firearms don't do it because they get off on killing people - which is what you'd think from the way they're described sometimes. Each time they've done it, it does seem to have been out of a genuine perception - sometimes wrong - that whoever they were targetting was a threat of some kind. As yet, we have no way of knowing whether the perception in this case was correct and it kind of depresses me that people refuse to see the ambiguities in the situation and immediately decide to side themselves against (or for) the police for no reason other than that's what they normally do.
Well as you say there's no facts being given out at the moment, but I've just read somewhere that according to that source, the Guardian says initial ballistic results in the bullet found in the policeman's radio was a police issue bullet. I'm quoting what I've just read, but if this is going to be printed then that will cause some problems even if not true won't it?