Film, Media & TV3 mins ago
Saudi Woman To Be Lashed For Driving
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...-middle-east-15079620
Only 10? It'll take more than that to instill decent driving skills into her.....!
Seriously, how can their government give Saudi women the right to vote yet continue to enforce such draconian laws?
Only 10? It'll take more than that to instill decent driving skills into her.....!
Seriously, how can their government give Saudi women the right to vote yet continue to enforce such draconian laws?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Philtaz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ichkeria. Please don't split hairs. I am showing a serious threat to national security here, the examples I have given to you show that it is possible to evade detection by wearing the Burqa there is therefore a serious breach in our defences by allowing this to be tolerated in our open society & could quite easily cover up many nefarious practices.For example many times it has been pointed out that I am required to remove a motor cycle crash helmet before entering a bank or building society branch because of the risk of robbery, is it therefore too much to ask that everyone else walking our streets be dressed according to our societies civilised rules ?
Ron.
Ron.
It isn't splitting hairs at all. You are suggesting that the wearing of burqas in public is a serious threat to national security. However, you have failed to produce any evidence whatever of this. There are many different ways of covering ones face, and I agree that all forms of restrictive headgear should be removed in certain cirumstances. However, it is a very drastic step to move from asking for, justifiably, equality in certain areas (entering banks, for example) to demanding a ban on specific items of headgear ostensibly because they are a threat to national security.
In the case of the burqa, it seems that a badly-thought-through correlation has been made between "Islamic item of clothing" to "terrorism".
I'm all in favour of preventing women being FORCED to wear it (though I don't see how that would be enforceable). However, simply banning it would make life pretty grim for many Moslem women, as many would probably be trapped at home.
In the case of the burqa, it seems that a badly-thought-through correlation has been made between "Islamic item of clothing" to "terrorism".
I'm all in favour of preventing women being FORCED to wear it (though I don't see how that would be enforceable). However, simply banning it would make life pretty grim for many Moslem women, as many would probably be trapped at home.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
If you need to lip-read then plainly you don't want to have someone covering their lips.
However, unless we think it a common or even occasional practice of would-be terrorists and criminals to mouth the words "I am evil and I'm about to press this button on my belt" then in a security context it's irrelevant.
However, unless we think it a common or even occasional practice of would-be terrorists and criminals to mouth the words "I am evil and I'm about to press this button on my belt" then in a security context it's irrelevant.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.