News3 mins ago
Hanging
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by joules99. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.http://www.innocent.org.uk
The death penalty doesn't work. If it did there wouldn't be so many murders in the US and it certainly didn't stop people killing here.
I think Locking them away for a very long time, no TV, no books to read, no one to talk to two meals a day. No time out. Its hard not to think and contemplate what you've done when there is nothing else to do.
Loneliness is a damning thing.
besides why lower yourself to their level.
Eupraxia
http://news.bbc.co.uk/60seconds/hi/english/briefing/newsid_1702000/1702467.stm
The judge said he was satisfied Whiting was out hunting for children and said he had turned his van into a "moving prison." The court was told the van contained a rope, knife, ties and soft materials.
Roy Whiting imprisoned Sarah in a white van
Sarah's naked and decomposed body was found on July 17 in a shallow grave just six inches deep. The court heard that her make-shift burial site would have taken just six minutes to dig.
The pathologist who analysed Sarah's body, told the court that the eight-year-old had met a "violent death" and she was the victim of a "sexually motivated homicide".
Previous assault
It was revealed today that Whiting served just over two years of his four year sentence for a previous assault and he had refused to take part in a prison scheme designed to rehabilitate sex offenders.
Vital fibres linking the shoe to items in Whiting's van were later found by forensic experts. It was the only piece of Sarah's clothing ever found.
Now, could anyone give me a reasonable explanation as to why this vermin should be allowed to live out his days at the expense of the taxpayer, with 3 meals a day and as many Open University courses as he likes?
I seriously doubt it.
As for the 'wanting to help and not punish them' argument I am often perplexed that the same sentiments are sadly lacking when it comes to helping the parents and families of the unfortunate victims.
We spend far too much time and effort trying to rehabilitate offenders of heinous,incomparable crimes, the vast majority of whom actively deny any such help.
delilahcat, I certainly resent being referred to as a Christian!
Anybody who is actually a committed practising Christian could not possibly agree with the death sentance.
Only the creator - God to a Christian - has the right to take life.
We have GOT to be more civilised than to commit legalised murder or there is no hope for us.
Hang on; people are confusing the issues here. Being against the death penalty does absolutely not mean you automatically believe the prison system is adequately 'strict' (respectfully cf. Philitaz). Just because our prisons are too lenient does not mean the only other option is to murder the perpetrator.
The "easy way out" argument is, in my opinion, also a valid point here. If someone was intent on committing suicide, then they could go out and commit allsorts of untold horrors, safe in the knowledge that the death they wanted is to be carried out at tax-payers' expense, safely and quickly. This would not be the case if they had visions of a severe and life-long prison sentence. Whilst I think the imagery of torture is possibly a little too strong, I do think pmj007 is more on the right lines.
Just to add some extra opinions:
Firstly a fact though: the majority of people who murder have never commited a crime previously and go on not to reoffend again.
For those people, I do not beleive that the death penalty is the right sentance.
However, for the minority of people who do reoffend or are guilty of mass murder (and I waould also add that these people would not only be found guilty by a jury, but have all the relevant appeals), the death penalty should be reintroduced.
People are sitting on death row in America for crimes they didn't commit - see www.wm3.org
And for those of you recommending torture jesus - what is wrong with you. I bet you wouldnt have the bollox to do it yourself either, or go and watch. Perhaps a trip to one of Saddams little play areas would change your mind. To wilfully inflict that kind of punishment on another human (yes they are human) is quite frankly sick. Perhaps you could watch on sky, make sure hes getting tortured properly. I am literally disgusted, I rank you people with the other criminals who think it acceptable. Pathetic little minds.
I can't be bothered to address each of the points made, but suffice to say they rely heavily on emotion. The point that drives my argument - these people are a product of us, our society. Until we eliminate the root causes of such actions, I believe that we must take responsibility for these people. Putting them in prison is not brushing it under the carpet -. killing someone and thinking you have solved the problem is just naive, and as already said those countries with the death penalty often have far higher crime rates anyway.
Of course victims and their families should have all the help they require, of course the modern prison justice system needs work, but that doesn't mean we return ourselves to the kind of simian, basic measures suggested here.
P.s. How many of you read the dailymail? ;)
p.p.s Thanks Delilahcat for your kind words. It is sad isn't it :(