Donate SIGN UP

Do you consider this barbaric?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 13:07 Sun 23rd Oct 2011 | News
40 Answers
http://www.dailymail....body-meat-locker.html

These are the type of people we have spent approx. £1.75b on, and now stage one is over perhaps a few million more in the future.

Was it worth it and would we allow our young to witness such morbid scenes?

/// Acting prime minister Mahmoud Jibril said today that investigations into who shot Gaddafi were continuing.///

Perhaps he should first put an end to this 'macabre ogling'?

Barbaric I call it.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Their house...........their rules.

At least the conspiracy theorists won't be able to claim that Gaddaffi is living life as a buxom blond in Zurich.......
I'm with you on this AOG, gruesome !
-- answer removed --
Question Author
jackthehat

/// Their house...........their rules. ///

Pity they don't accept that when they come to 'our' country.
What is sick is taking children in to see the body - its like they are queuing up for the cinema (:o(
How many of these 'freedom-fighters' have you recognised from their visits to the UK?

Or are you indulging in one of your blanket generalisations, again?
Have you seen Libyan cinema? I would think viewing Qadaffi is much more "attractive"
I don't think so - OK it may be a bit more untidy that we are used to, but thousands queued to see Churchill's body lying in State.
I would have preferred it if he had been brought to trial, but I bet Tony Blair is breathing a sigh of relief.
yes it lacks dignity and humanity.
what goes around comes around i guess? x
There would always have been a resistance movement while he was still alive
my sentiments to, at least with Churchill, he died peacefully and wasn't covered in gunshot, it's not like they are paying their respects?
maybe they want to make doubly sure he's dead?
To our eyes yes - but Arab culture is very different in many ways, and the sight of death is probably far more common to the viewers than it would be to us.

Enough people have lived under the tyranny of Ghadaffi to want to see for themselves a man that so many regarded as virtually imortal.

I don't see that this one action negates the money spent on liberating the Lybian people - that is a separate debate entirely.
You need to understand that this man terrorised, robbed and murdered these people for 42 years. They've been fighting a bloody civil war to get rid of him.
And are we so perfect here?
Was in a rescue team at Lockerbie. Just don't care what they do to him
No, I don't consider it barbaric.
The pictures that were in the mail, particularly the front page was horrific, so sorry not going to open any more links in this regard. I too wished he had been brought to book and stood trial, but that seemed unlikely. Seeing Churchill lying in state was a totally different matter, as someone said, his body was old, not riddled with bullets.
The pics are not gruesome Em.
Barbaric?.....yes.

Understandable.....yes.

We in the West have not lived under a tyrannical regime for almost half a century and cannot comprehend murder, genocide, rape repression as the Libyan people have endured.

IRA, Lockerbie, the Libyan Embassy............

It would be reassuring to see the dead body of the tyrant.
sqad, that would be the 1960's, swinging London and all that, tyranny, not sure what you mean.

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Do you consider this barbaric?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.