Business & Finance8 mins ago
No Poo-Poo, Sherlock
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16237077
Police training and response 'inadequate' says a group of MP's.
Did we really need a select committee to tell us that the way the Met dealt with the summer riots was about as much use as a handbrake on a canoe?
Police training and response 'inadequate' says a group of MP's.
Did we really need a select committee to tell us that the way the Met dealt with the summer riots was about as much use as a handbrake on a canoe?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Philtaz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes they should have just asked you and saved themselves a lot of bother.
However they will look at all aspects of the case, some of which may not be in the public domain (what was said in secret police and council and government meetings during the riot for example).
Also, lets face it, it was an unusual situation, it is rare we have spontanious rioting all over the UK.
When the "unusual" happens (twin towers, 7/7 bombs, zeebrugee, kings cross station fire, Appollo 13 etc) often the response is not perfect because it is hard to totally plan for things like that.
However they will look at all aspects of the case, some of which may not be in the public domain (what was said in secret police and council and government meetings during the riot for example).
Also, lets face it, it was an unusual situation, it is rare we have spontanious rioting all over the UK.
When the "unusual" happens (twin towers, 7/7 bombs, zeebrugee, kings cross station fire, Appollo 13 etc) often the response is not perfect because it is hard to totally plan for things like that.
However, why the inquiry will focus on what went on behind scenes and how to improve communications and operations, one would have thought that they would have this one reasonably well-tied down already, given the Brixron riots and the troubles with the drug riots across the country before, mind you several years ago.
Many thanks to the moderator who changed my headline to poo poo as opposed to the asterisked 'sh!t' that I'd typed! In my defence the title is an oft used phrase so the moderation of it has a rather muted effect.
Somehow other posters are able to circumvent the auto moderator and type p!ss, b@stard and all other types of curse words but when I self-moderate my own OP it still gets changed!
Great job.
Somehow other posters are able to circumvent the auto moderator and type p!ss, b@stard and all other types of curse words but when I self-moderate my own OP it still gets changed!
Great job.
Well whoever it was craft it'd be nice to see a little bit of consistency, whether it be changing the text of an OP or a reply.
I fail to see how the Ed feels one needs (further) moderation for the most minor swear word as opposed to replies with far more offensive expletives which are typed in full.
I fail to see how the Ed feels one needs (further) moderation for the most minor swear word as opposed to replies with far more offensive expletives which are typed in full.
You know, if there's one thing I've learnt from being in the Army, it's never ignore a pooh-pooh. I knew a Major, who got pooh-poohed, made the mistake of ignoring the pooh-pooh. He pooh-poohed it! Fatal error! 'Cos it turned out all along that the soldier who pooh-poohed him had been pooh-poohing a lot of other officers who pooh-poohed their pooh-poohs. In the end, we had to disband the regiment. Morale totally destroyed... by pooh-pooh!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.