Quizzes & Puzzles25 mins ago
Give and ye will receive - not!
I copy this from the Mail-on-Line website, I couldn't have have put it better myself. Ungrateful b................
"Well that's gratitude! We give India £1bn in aid, THEY snub the UK and give France a £13bn jet contract"
Read more: http://www.dailymail....ct.html#ixzz1l7TFLKrx
"Well that's gratitude! We give India £1bn in aid, THEY snub the UK and give France a £13bn jet contract"
Read more: http://www.dailymail....ct.html#ixzz1l7TFLKrx
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Dodger666. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.its disappointing, but are you suggesting we should give aid so these countries can bolster our defence industry or that our aid should pay for military jets ?
the eurofigher typhoon is more expensive and given that bae shed 3000 jobs last year, delivery capability would be questionable. and, we only build a part of the eurofighter. we share production with germans, austrians, spanish, and italian..........
the eurofigher typhoon is more expensive and given that bae shed 3000 jobs last year, delivery capability would be questionable. and, we only build a part of the eurofighter. we share production with germans, austrians, spanish, and italian..........
"its disappointing, but are you suggesting we should give aid so these countries can bolster our defence industry or that our aid should pay for military jets ?"
In a word no, I'm not suggesting that all! I thought the aid was for the underdeveloped regions of India, not for buying fighter planes from France or the UK, or indeed to fund their space programme. If they can afford to spend money on these things they don't need help from the British taxpayer.
The article suggest the planes cost the same amount. In fact the Eurofighter is better in all respects, speed, payload & range. Furthermore, if we won the contract some of those 3000 jobs lost may be reinstated.
If it's possible we should withhold the next three years £280M and tell the Indians to go cap in hand to France.
In a word no, I'm not suggesting that all! I thought the aid was for the underdeveloped regions of India, not for buying fighter planes from France or the UK, or indeed to fund their space programme. If they can afford to spend money on these things they don't need help from the British taxpayer.
The article suggest the planes cost the same amount. In fact the Eurofighter is better in all respects, speed, payload & range. Furthermore, if we won the contract some of those 3000 jobs lost may be reinstated.
If it's possible we should withhold the next three years £280M and tell the Indians to go cap in hand to France.
// The Eurofighter Typhoon is a twin-engine, canard-delta wing, multirole fighter.[5][6] The Typhoon was designed by a consortium of three companies: EADS, Alenia Aeronautica and BAE Systems; working through a holding company, Eurofighter GmbH, which was formed in 1986. //
http://en.wikipedia.o...i/Eurofighter_Typhoon
More Daily Mail heap of sh*t distortion designed to anger the gullible.
http://en.wikipedia.o...i/Eurofighter_Typhoon
More Daily Mail heap of sh*t distortion designed to anger the gullible.
Ankou - "agree but mr cameron does not want to cut aid to foreign nations (including india)."
So Mr Cameron has to be right? No possibility for us to disagree?
Nuts to that.
If we get some influence or credit for our aid, well and good, but we don't seem to be getting anything.
I'd agree with sending aid in the form of manufactured goods, as it's harder to siphon off into the pockets of corrupt officials.
So Mr Cameron has to be right? No possibility for us to disagree?
Nuts to that.
If we get some influence or credit for our aid, well and good, but we don't seem to be getting anything.
I'd agree with sending aid in the form of manufactured goods, as it's harder to siphon off into the pockets of corrupt officials.