“Becoming a candidate is by no means the same as becoming a member”
Quite true, rojash. So show me a country which became a candidate, but which was turned down for membership.
It has gone a bit quiet on Turkey, jake, but not that quiet. Yesterday it was announced that the UK (via the EU, natch) is to contribute £80m to improve Turkey’s sewage system:
http://www.turkeycent...nations-sewer-system/
This is to enable them to improve their facilities to meet EU standards. So now we are paying not only to improve the infrastructure of EU member states, but also to improve that of “pre-candidate” states. Meanwhile, of course, “customers” of the water companies in the UK have had to pay increased bills to improve our facilities. No such EU largesse for them.
As a matter of interest all new member states must undertake to adopt the euro. The Maastricht Treaty allowed opt outs for member states at the time it was signed, but new members must agree to adopt the single currency.
Do we really need any more potless “candidates”? Answers on a postcard please.