Adverts4 mins ago
Home Secretary
66 Answers
"Does Theresa May know what day it is?"
That's today's headline over the Times Online's article about the latest Abu Q farce. (I've decided to call him A Book At Bedtime from now on.)
Well, does she?
That's today's headline over the Times Online's article about the latest Abu Q farce. (I've decided to call him A Book At Bedtime from now on.)
Well, does she?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Quizmonster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It beggars belief that Yvette Cooper currently shadow Home secretary is criticising the Government regarding the Qatada case. She and her Labour cronies were responsible for his presence in the UK during the last decade. Did they act swiftly to deport him? I understand this stupid woman is married to Ed Balls. That figures!
gromit/jno you're both right......but labour did have 10 years to do this and did nothing for most of that time However, the whole thing is a poor reflection of the way this country tows the line and gets kicked in the gonads for doing so. It does not reflect well on anyone, or the asylum process as a whole. Think the whole issue needs addressing from top to bottom.
For a person to stand in a London Street, a known Anti British pratt who condems a country that had taken him & his tribe in, supply them with a double house, & give hand out's, you go into any country abroad & try it, do you think they would keep you,? do you think if you where put in prison & demand a laptop like this clown you would get it? wake up do-gooders this is the year 2012
Anti-British Prat. Are you sure?
// Britain ignored warnings — which began before the 11 September attacks — from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain. //
// Britain ignored warnings — which began before the 11 September attacks — from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain. //
Apparently, journalists warned the Government that the ECHR were saying the order was due to run out on Tuesday night. The Government insisted it was Monday. But if there was any ambiguity then they should not have arrested him Monday but waited a few hours.
There are two possibilities, neither of which are good for the Government.
1. They knew ECHR were saying it ran out on Tuesday night but ignored it leading to Qatada's wrongful arrest and delay in his deportation.
2. They deliberately jumped the gun to discredit the ECHR. Reading this thread aptly illustrates that is what has happened.
There are two possibilities, neither of which are good for the Government.
1. They knew ECHR were saying it ran out on Tuesday night but ignored it leading to Qatada's wrongful arrest and delay in his deportation.
2. They deliberately jumped the gun to discredit the ECHR. Reading this thread aptly illustrates that is what has happened.
Having started this thread with a headline from Times Online yesterday, I thought i might end it with another headline from the same source today...
"May undone by simple mathematics"
Thanks to all for your responses, apart from the obviously silly ones, but especially to you, Ludwig. I was beginning to think no one was going to respond to the sound-effect point in my question. Now, I can not just SAY the name-variant, I can SING it, too!
"May undone by simple mathematics"
Thanks to all for your responses, apart from the obviously silly ones, but especially to you, Ludwig. I was beginning to think no one was going to respond to the sound-effect point in my question. Now, I can not just SAY the name-variant, I can SING it, too!
// All taken place once Labour were finally chucked out, now what does that tell you? //
It tells me you have forgotten that Labour were still in power for one third of that year and were not chucked out until May. The 2011 figure will be interesting, so you think it will be higher? If it isn't what does that tell you?
It tells me you have forgotten that Labour were still in power for one third of that year and were not chucked out until May. The 2011 figure will be interesting, so you think it will be higher? If it isn't what does that tell you?
AOG
I have now found the deportation statistics since the coalition came to power. Would you care to comment on this graph?
http://fullfact.org/s...tions%20of%20FNPs.png
I have now found the deportation statistics since the coalition came to power. Would you care to comment on this graph?
http://fullfact.org/s...tions%20of%20FNPs.png