News1 min ago
In a word . . . .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.They have one child with two homosexual parents, but to have two children is pathetic?
We read every day of neglected and abused and unloved children, and unfortunately they grow up (if they are lucky) to be neglectful, abusive and unloving to their own children.
Here we have two people who can afford to spend a lot of time bringing up children in (hopefully) an happy environment, and you are rejecting that because they are queer.
To prefer children are brought up in an unhappy environment rather than with loving foster parents, seems very queer to me.
We read every day of neglected and abused and unloved children, and unfortunately they grow up (if they are lucky) to be neglectful, abusive and unloving to their own children.
Here we have two people who can afford to spend a lot of time bringing up children in (hopefully) an happy environment, and you are rejecting that because they are queer.
To prefer children are brought up in an unhappy environment rather than with loving foster parents, seems very queer to me.
I agree it is perfectly natural to want a sibling for an only child, and David Furnish and Elton John appear to be loving parents and have the wherewithal to ensure their children never want for anything, so good luck to them.
But I must take issue with the default reaction of some posters who seem to think the opinion that children should be brought up by a man and a women is homophobic.
It isn't homophobic to hold this opinion, and anybody who thinks it is homophobic doesn't really understand what homophobia is.
But I must take issue with the default reaction of some posters who seem to think the opinion that children should be brought up by a man and a women is homophobic.
It isn't homophobic to hold this opinion, and anybody who thinks it is homophobic doesn't really understand what homophobia is.
[i]Here we have two people who can afford to spend a lot of time bringing up children in (hopefully) an happy environment,[i]
Regarding spending a lot of time with them, with these two's lifestyle do you really think they be able to afford very much time to spend with their children? No they will mostly be in care of a nanny and then when old enough sent away to a private boarding school.
Has anyone thought about the happiness of the children, rather than thinking about the happiness of Elton John and his partner David Furnish? Yes it's true the children won't have to want for anything, but money does not bring happiness.
Regarding spending a lot of time with them, with these two's lifestyle do you really think they be able to afford very much time to spend with their children? No they will mostly be in care of a nanny and then when old enough sent away to a private boarding school.
Has anyone thought about the happiness of the children, rather than thinking about the happiness of Elton John and his partner David Furnish? Yes it's true the children won't have to want for anything, but money does not bring happiness.