ChatterBank1 min ago
Islam at it's very worse.
146 Answers
http://www.dailymail....ours-AFTER-death.html
Is this not one of the most abominable and disgusting practices to be introduced by a Islamic-dominated parliament?
Is this not one of the most abominable and disgusting practices to be introduced by a Islamic-dominated parliament?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Maybe it depends on the topic.
I believe The Muslim Council of Britain or whatever they're called regularly condemn terrorism, honour killings etc to the extent that the media tend not to bother repeating them.
so far as stories such as this OP maybe they don't want to dignify them with a reply.
After all, one wouldn't expect the Archbishop of Canterbury to be on the media every week rebutting the latest deluded ideas from some mad christian evangelist in North Carolina
I believe The Muslim Council of Britain or whatever they're called regularly condemn terrorism, honour killings etc to the extent that the media tend not to bother repeating them.
so far as stories such as this OP maybe they don't want to dignify them with a reply.
After all, one wouldn't expect the Archbishop of Canterbury to be on the media every week rebutting the latest deluded ideas from some mad christian evangelist in North Carolina
naomi24
/// An apology for your error would be courteous, AOG. ///
Yes I agree I did make a mistake for which I apologise, although I still think that your post should have been removed also,
But having said that I am still waiting for some apologies for being accused of reacting to Daily Mail lies, when it has been proven that more examples of this news story have been reported by other news outlets apart from the Daily Mail's.
Still even it it is too much to ask for an apology from some quarters, it is refreshing to see that some kind of a sensible debate now appears to have taken place over this news item.
/// An apology for your error would be courteous, AOG. ///
Yes I agree I did make a mistake for which I apologise, although I still think that your post should have been removed also,
But having said that I am still waiting for some apologies for being accused of reacting to Daily Mail lies, when it has been proven that more examples of this news story have been reported by other news outlets apart from the Daily Mail's.
Still even it it is too much to ask for an apology from some quarters, it is refreshing to see that some kind of a sensible debate now appears to have taken place over this news item.
Zeuhl. All it would take is a British cleric to say that what is condoned in the middle east, is against the Quaran, and it would break wide open. To my knowledge it has never happened.
To my understanding, it took years of coercement, by all sides, for the Muslim Council to issue those condemnations.
The reason they aren't reported now is they issued the statement and shut up.
To my understanding, it took years of coercement, by all sides, for the Muslim Council to issue those condemnations.
The reason they aren't reported now is they issued the statement and shut up.
By the way, France permits someone to marry a person who has been dead for months. They don't even require them to have been formally engaged or to have announced any formal plan to marry. They don't, however, expect the corpse to be present at the ceremony or the bride or groom to have sex with their new spouse to consummate the marriage.
Yes, AOG, hm has given a link to one such. The one I read in France concerned a woman who had been cohabiting with a police motor-cyclist. He was killed on duty. She was not entitled to his pension or other benefits which his widow would have had. She applied for permission to marry. The application has to be approved by someone quite high up; I seem to recall some department in the President's office was involved. I got the impression that, notionally, it required the President's approval which could be given by his agent such as the Prefect.
The point of this is financial and practical and not entirely a romantic one.
The point of this is financial and practical and not entirely a romantic one.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.