Does Anyone Remember Hans + Lotte Hass..
ChatterBank6 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Bomyed. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is possible to obtain Legal Aid regardless of income to defend a case in the Magistrates' Court. Once the case is transferred to Crown Court (which this particular one may or may not be) then the Defendant's income has a very acute bearing on the granting of Leagl Aid.
Two points here, (a) the costs involved in assessing income in the lower courts outweighes the cost of just granting it to anyone who asks on a limited basis; (b) many Defendents who feel that the case being brought against them by the Crown Prosecution Service is unjust, trivial, or provoking of publicity will elect to use public funds to assist their defence as a "tit for tat" or bloody minded gesture where they could easily afford the lawyer's fees. "Why should I spend my money on this XXX case when it is all trumped up and blown out of proportion by the State" (Not an actual quotation in this particular case or any other, but an indication of how some people's minds might work.)
I think what's truly offensive is that Diouf applied for legal aid in the first place. The man is an awful specimen, as his repeatedly obnoxious behaviour has shown, just look at what he is being taken to court for....an offence that he has been previously found guilty of. He may well lose his job if convicted, but if so, it's entirely his own fault.
And yes, means testing legal aid would seem to be common sense, wouldn't it?