Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
It gets worse and worse.
45 Answers
http:// www.gua rdian.c ...-oly mpic-se curity- g4s
/// Security guards provided for the Olympics by the firm G4S may not be able to speak English, the company's chief executive has admitted. ///
Well I wonder how much more it's going to cost us to provide interpreters?
For example a Bulgarian border guard may say Добре дошли в Англия , Welcome to England.
/// Security guards provided for the Olympics by the firm G4S may not be able to speak English, the company's chief executive has admitted. ///
Well I wonder how much more it's going to cost us to provide interpreters?
For example a Bulgarian border guard may say Добре дошли в Англия , Welcome to England.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.that's it, thanks, LazyGun. That appears to be a significant change to the deal G4S originally signed up to. According to the BBC:
"G4S signed the contract with Locog in 2010 to supply 2,000 security staff to work at Olympic venues. In December 2011, the Games organisers asked the company to provide some 8,000 more, bringing the total to approximately 10,000 staff."
Locog might suddenly demand five times as many staff, but it doesn't mean the pool of suitable candidates is suddenly going to quintuple, and the time available for finding them is of course constantly shrinking.
I have no idea why nobody spotted the problems until last week. All the same, I suspect the focus on G4S may be letting Locog off the hook.
"G4S signed the contract with Locog in 2010 to supply 2,000 security staff to work at Olympic venues. In December 2011, the Games organisers asked the company to provide some 8,000 more, bringing the total to approximately 10,000 staff."
Locog might suddenly demand five times as many staff, but it doesn't mean the pool of suitable candidates is suddenly going to quintuple, and the time available for finding them is of course constantly shrinking.
I have no idea why nobody spotted the problems until last week. All the same, I suspect the focus on G4S may be letting Locog off the hook.
I have already posted a thread on this subject
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 51743.h tml
http://
the idea isn't to hit planes, it's to deter them. Even if some suicidal pilot did decide to crash into the stadium, you'd expect him to be detected and neutralised far away from Stratford. London airspace is already tightly patrolled. Long ago - before 9/11 - I was on a helicopter which went off course over the Thames because the pilot accidentally switched his radio off. When he switched it back on again you could hear the sound of the boll*cking above the sound of the rotors...
I just cannot believe they gave G4S (or old name Group Four Security) this responsible job - after all that fiasco a few years back when they kept "losing" prisoners, and several escaped when G4S were transferring them between jails. The government have only themselves to blame, they must have such bad memories!
http:// www.ind ependen ...-inm ates-14 55465.h tml
http://
I can't understand why anyone in their right mind would pay £hundreds or even £thousands just to attend. TV channels on the red button would cover more than any olympic seat. If on top of the expense you are also subjected to a home made bomb being smuggled in it seems pointless.
Even the underground has security personnel and what with the thousands of cameras failed to prevent those bombers what hope is there for your safety. All this security stuff is getting just like the US and I wonder when everyone of importance has to have a bullet proof car.
Even the underground has security personnel and what with the thousands of cameras failed to prevent those bombers what hope is there for your safety. All this security stuff is getting just like the US and I wonder when everyone of importance has to have a bullet proof car.