Can't see anything changing. The Gun lobby is too powerful. The right to bear arms and kill each other has been part of the constitution for centuries.
There have been many massacres and there will be many more. Hope this isn't an ex-military attacker. I saw a suggestion that it could be.
Unfortunately most americans beleive it's a god given right for them to possess a firearm .
The following is the position of the NRA .
//These politicians need to remember that these rights aren’t given to us by them. They come from God. They are God-given rights. They can’t be infringed or limited in any way. What are they going to do: limit it two or three rounds. Having lots of ammunition is critical, especially if the police are not around and you need to be able to defend yourself against mobs.”" //
Untill and unless you can change that sort of mentality , then it is very difficult to stop any Tom Dick or Harry obtaining and walking around with this type of weapon
We had draconian gun laws as a knee jerk reaction forced on us by His Toniness. Did it stop it, did it heck
The US would be evern worse. On a border with Mexico and a huge country that would be impossible to police. Parts of America still need guns to defend them selves, not from other humans but predators. There would be an outcry if a Govenment banned firearms and then someone was mauled by a grizzly or similar.
It was the rampage type of attack I was wondering about and although not entirely clear it doesn't look as if America is significantly worse than Europe.
Given that the individual European countries have widely differing gun laws and rampages occur in the countries with both tight and more relaxed gun laws I don't see that much would change by the US tightening up.
And did you know that in Chester, a person is permitted to shoot a Welshman with a bow and arrow, as long as he is inside the city walls after midnight?
Or that all English males over the age of 14 are required by law to have two hours of longbow practice each week?