And the Attorney General will, after due consideration of all the evidence (viz. as long as it takes to type 'not in the public interest and no reasonable prospect of conviction') say no. Whatever excuse is used, the result is just.
I know nothing about that syndrome.
My point is that, without a conviction, no agency can compel him to modify his behaviour or even accept that anything he did was wrong.
By the way, it's the DPP,not the A G,who is to consider the case, according to Teresa May. "Same difference":both have powers over prosecutions. The decision is still predictable.