Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
So he is staying here . . .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.God jake, how many times do you have to trot out this "...It's a lot easier to keep tabs on someone who might be dangerous to the UK ..." line. By that thinking we'd be far safer if all the world's terrorists were living in the UK (in council houses, with their families and all living on benefits, natch) than if they were elsewhere. Similarly I suppose we've been in far greater peril since Abu Hamza was carted off to the USA a few weeks back.
The best thing to do with terrorists who despise this country and who make threats towards its security is to get them out and keep them out - or better still, to never allow them entry in the first place. To suggest that we are somehow better off keeping them here is ludicrous.
The best thing to do with terrorists who despise this country and who make threats towards its security is to get them out and keep them out - or better still, to never allow them entry in the first place. To suggest that we are somehow better off keeping them here is ludicrous.
Well yes if ou of site is out of mind we don't need an MI6 do we?
I'll trot it out NJ until peoplestart using their brains and ralisig that simply deportig someone doesn't stop them being a threat!
Righto we export all these nasty people Oh look there's a bomb going off in a Britih embassy n the Middle East.
Oh there's a BA flight brought down in the far East!
Whilst they're here their mobile phones canbe tpped and tracked, their electronic comunications can be intercepted ther movements can be followed.
How are you going to do that in Yemen eh?
or is that jut ludicrous?
I'll trot it out NJ until peoplestart using their brains and ralisig that simply deportig someone doesn't stop them being a threat!
Righto we export all these nasty people Oh look there's a bomb going off in a Britih embassy n the Middle East.
Oh there's a BA flight brought down in the far East!
Whilst they're here their mobile phones canbe tpped and tracked, their electronic comunications can be intercepted ther movements can be followed.
How are you going to do that in Yemen eh?
or is that jut ludicrous?
"Whilst they're here their mobile phones canbe tpped and tracked, their electronic comunications can be intercepted ther movements can be followed. "
theres why you wont ever be working for the intelligence services
do you honestly think he uses a mobile ?,
do you actually think that he doesnt realise hes under 24/7/365 surveillance, electronic comms or otherwise
theres why you wont ever be working for the intelligence services
do you honestly think he uses a mobile ?,
do you actually think that he doesnt realise hes under 24/7/365 surveillance, electronic comms or otherwise
For a very large fee, I'll write him "poetry" and read it out aloud. Douglas, given your comments, I'll start on the subject of Highland Coos with him and wear him down, even 10 minutes after I am supposed to have left (lol)........... That will soon have him leave the UK of his own accord, or would this torture be deemed the verbal equivalent of water-boarding?
"out of sight out of mind"
just to clarify, i meant that from the standpoint of I dont care how the jordanians supposedly got evidence that they may or may not use against him.
If they do convict him, and I would bet on it, i couldnt care less what they then do with him.
Everything I read leads me to believe that once in jordan that will be the last we see or hear of him for a very very long time.
just to clarify, i meant that from the standpoint of I dont care how the jordanians supposedly got evidence that they may or may not use against him.
If they do convict him, and I would bet on it, i couldnt care less what they then do with him.
Everything I read leads me to believe that once in jordan that will be the last we see or hear of him for a very very long time.
"In a statement to MPs the Home Secretary described Abu Qatada said the government “strongly disagrees” with the ruling but resisted calls from Tory MPs to put “the interests of National Security first”, fly Qatada to Jordan and “worry about the consequences later”
if only she would , but shes obviously spineless
if only she would , but shes obviously spineless
"If they've not comitted an offense that makes that possible it's much better they are here than wandering free about the world.
And if you can't see that I give up "
Well you must consider giving up, jake. I can't see that for the simple reason that, as I said earlier, to extend that logic it must be safer for the UK if we accommodate all dangerous terrorists here so that we can "keep an eye on them". Really? I think not.
The idea of deporting Abu Qatada is that he should stand trial and hopefully be convicted and incarcerated in Jordan, where he faces serious charges. A similar situation prevailed with Abu Hamza. The notion that we would be better off keeping such people in comfort here in the UK defies belief.
And if you can't see that I give up "
Well you must consider giving up, jake. I can't see that for the simple reason that, as I said earlier, to extend that logic it must be safer for the UK if we accommodate all dangerous terrorists here so that we can "keep an eye on them". Really? I think not.
The idea of deporting Abu Qatada is that he should stand trial and hopefully be convicted and incarcerated in Jordan, where he faces serious charges. A similar situation prevailed with Abu Hamza. The notion that we would be better off keeping such people in comfort here in the UK defies belief.