Home & Garden2 mins ago
Pistorius Polarisation
120 Answers
i can't recall another case where, from the outset, people for and against the accused have publicly claimed such opposing accounts of what happened. It seems that every few hours someone from one side or the other comes out with an explanation to try and sway opinion as to whether Pistorius did or didn't kill his girlfriend. The media will lap up anything about the case because it is sensational, it features a high-profile celebrity, and most importantly to them it features a beautiful young girl - the greatest obsession of the media today. Both the coverage and the counter claims are so totally distasteful considering the girl is dead. Her hideous demise and its effects on her loved ones appears completely overlooked as the media milks the case for all its worth and Pistorius' friends and foes focus on clearing or blackening his name before a court can decide. Your thoughts?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by princerupe74. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Not guilty until proven though, MT....that's the point, and I am sure you are right when it comes to throwing in the scared part, "I was asleep" bit, etc - not so sure about the "stupid" though, the point being that we are not privy to all the evidence that the prosecution and defence have, so it's all speculation and scenario creation.
/// The Police naturally want to persuade the world that Oscar must be guilty, ///
The more the police want to persuade the world of his guilt, and the media who also seem to have him guilty, surely only makes a stronger case for the defence that he can't possible get a fair trial.
Judging by some of the replies on this thread even the majority of AnswerBankers have made up their minds that he his guilty.
The more the police want to persuade the world of his guilt, and the media who also seem to have him guilty, surely only makes a stronger case for the defence that he can't possible get a fair trial.
Judging by some of the replies on this thread even the majority of AnswerBankers have made up their minds that he his guilty.
It should be a very simple case to prove.
Who said there was a burglar?
Not the police.
Will there be any evidence of a burglar/break-in ?
If so he must have come through the bathroom window r was a bit of a pervert (why would you be rummaging round the bathroom?)
You seem to want him to be innocent JJ at what ever cost.
It looks very much like he ended the life of an innocent you woman, that to me makes him as bad as any other non famous killer.
I haven't said he is guilty, I have said it looks very much like he is guilty.
Who said there was a burglar?
Not the police.
Will there be any evidence of a burglar/break-in ?
If so he must have come through the bathroom window r was a bit of a pervert (why would you be rummaging round the bathroom?)
You seem to want him to be innocent JJ at what ever cost.
It looks very much like he ended the life of an innocent you woman, that to me makes him as bad as any other non famous killer.
I haven't said he is guilty, I have said it looks very much like he is guilty.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.