Yorkshire Air Ambulance Comes In The...
Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
What Is This Council Playing At!!!!
125 Answers
http://
Building a new home for her - she should be made to get a job!
Your thoughts please
Building a new home for her - she should be made to get a job!
Your thoughts please
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by friedgreentomato. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Her sprogs are no more likely to work or be on benefit than some other's sprogs. But what we do know in this overpopulated world/county is that when she leaves she leaves behind many more people than the 2 parents that will be leaving.
The other issue is that by caring for the innocent kids to the extent that this sort of handout on demand goes on, there is no incentive for others not to follow her example. Muggings forced to pay for those with little sense of responsibility. Hard though it may be the only sane path is to provide bare necessities and not spurge out with tax money to make life comfortable for those who think society owes them a livelihood. It doesn't.
The other issue is that by caring for the innocent kids to the extent that this sort of handout on demand goes on, there is no incentive for others not to follow her example. Muggings forced to pay for those with little sense of responsibility. Hard though it may be the only sane path is to provide bare necessities and not spurge out with tax money to make life comfortable for those who think society owes them a livelihood. It doesn't.
Her main problem with her current house appears to be that she can't keep an eye on all her children whilst living in two houses, and only having one door as a fire escape is a danger. SO.... why don't they just knock that house into one? Surely that would be the cheaper option?
You can't blame her, though. She is only doing what our country ALLOWS her to do.
Yes she should go out and get a job. Yes she should get off benefits and be a better role model to her children, but what is the incentive these days? The cost of living has gone through the roof, but wages aren't increasing. As someone's already mentioned, she would need to earn about 50k a year just to match what she is currently receiving.
The way the system is set up, it just makes no sense at all.
You can't blame her, though. She is only doing what our country ALLOWS her to do.
Yes she should go out and get a job. Yes she should get off benefits and be a better role model to her children, but what is the incentive these days? The cost of living has gone through the roof, but wages aren't increasing. As someone's already mentioned, she would need to earn about 50k a year just to match what she is currently receiving.
The way the system is set up, it just makes no sense at all.
Ah, yeah. I see your point. I'm sure the Daily Mail must have realised that too. Just re-read it, and it doesn't actually mention what benefits she gets, or did I miss that? We know she obviously gets Housing Benefit, but maybe you're right, maybe her partner works. Would people think it was so bad then?
I don't agree with it all, but no one can blame her. We live in a country where our system makes it more beneficial for some people to stay at home, look after their children and claim benefits. Where's the sense in that?
I don't agree with it all, but no one can blame her. We live in a country where our system makes it more beneficial for some people to stay at home, look after their children and claim benefits. Where's the sense in that?
