It’s strange that some people see fit to grade a crime such as domestic burglary according to its victims. Mr Scott’s obvious dislike for the “celebrities” he chose to thieve from demonstrates his obvious contempt for them:
“upper-class prats chattering in monosyllables”.
“Robbing that bastard Aspinall was one of my favourites,” he recollected. “Sophia Loren got what she deserved too.”
However, nobody deserves to have their dwelling or hotel room broken into and their belongings stolen, especially by such a low-life as this creep. There are no exceptions to this whatever the victim’s source of income, their lifestyle or occupation. The fact that they “can afford it” (and who decides whether they can or cannot) makes no difference. That’s why I find it strange that the crime should be excusable by some simply based on the status of the victim.
Mr Scott was not a loveable rogue. He was a thief, a burglar, someone who broke into other people’s homes and stole their belongings. Among the lowest of the low. He did not serve anywhere near long enough in prison for his sins and thankfully society has now been granted a permanent respite from his despicable activities.
So RIP? Hopefully not.
The roll-call of “marks” from whom he claimed to have stolen valuables included Zsa Zsa Gabor, Lauren Bacall, Elizabeth Taylor, Vivien Leigh, Sophia Loren, Maria Callas and the gambling club and zoo owner John Aspinall.