The majority of state benefits are paid to people who are IN employment, not out of it.
Further, if the number of genuine job vacancies is far less than the available labour pool, there are bound to be people out of work [even if they're desperate to find it]. (Several employment agencies in this area try to ensure that their jobs are always near to the top of the lists on the Government's Universal Jobmatch service by re-listing them every few days. That results in a single vacancy appearing as perhaps half a dozen different jobs in official statistics).
I've not had regular employment for over 7 years, which means that I receive some state benefits. However I'm most definitely not work shy as:
(a) I've applied for over 2000 jobs ; and
(b) I accept whatever casual work is offered to me.
Yes, I agree that any system needs to be looked at if a few people are able to milk that system, and that (in our present financial circumstances) some cuts are necessary, but there is a minimum income level below which it is impossible for families to feed their children and no cuts should be made which take a family's income below such a level.