Body & Soul0 min ago
Stormin Norman Tells It Like It Is
18 Answers
http:// tinyurl .com/c5 m5emv
this will bring tears to the euophiles eyes, as well it should,
If I was one of you europhiles I'd take some indigestion tablets before reading the article and have your blood pressure meds on standby
this will bring tears to the euophiles eyes, as well it should,
If I was one of you europhiles I'd take some indigestion tablets before reading the article and have your blood pressure meds on standby
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I can't quite understand why anyone would look up to a country that shows such flagrant disregard for the rules of a club it's in. The French should just leave if that's really how they feel, rather than being dishonest and cherry-picking so much.
It was an important read even so, I didn't realise quite how tiny the margin on that decision was.
It was an important read even so, I didn't realise quite how tiny the margin on that decision was.
Someone who wants political advertising on our television Screens (Do we want that?) challenged the UK laws that forbids it at the ECHR. Not sure why Tebbit coyly says a charity have been denied airtime, failing to mention they wanted to show political ads?
Anyhow, he EHCR came down on our side of the UK Government, that our laws banning Political advertising did not break any rights to free speech which is a Human Right.
The UK signed up to ECHR long ago so they are of course the right court to hear this challenge to our law banning political advertising on TV.
Churchill signed us up to the European Convention on Human Rights
Heath got us in the EEC
Tebbit supported the Single European Act.
While he was a Cabinet Minister he could have pushed for the withdrawal of the UK from Europe (and the ECHR) but didn't.
The ECHR are the right Court to hear this and this is the right Decision.
- They have support UK laws and said they do not deny free speech.
- They have supported our ban on Political Advertising on TV
So I can't really see what the Tebbit / baz / ymb are bleating about.
Anyhow, he EHCR came down on our side of the UK Government, that our laws banning Political advertising did not break any rights to free speech which is a Human Right.
The UK signed up to ECHR long ago so they are of course the right court to hear this challenge to our law banning political advertising on TV.
Churchill signed us up to the European Convention on Human Rights
Heath got us in the EEC
Tebbit supported the Single European Act.
While he was a Cabinet Minister he could have pushed for the withdrawal of the UK from Europe (and the ECHR) but didn't.
The ECHR are the right Court to hear this and this is the right Decision.
- They have support UK laws and said they do not deny free speech.
- They have supported our ban on Political Advertising on TV
So I can't really see what the Tebbit / baz / ymb are bleating about.
please note, they didn't want us in, and told us so.
http:// news.bb c.co.uk /onthis day/hi/ dates/s tories/ novembe r/27/ne wsid_41 87000/4 187714. stm
http://
Yawn!
//Socialism and the allied doctrines of the Left regard property as belonging to "the community"//
Yes you can tell that by all the Nationalisation that happened under Tony Blair's decade in power.
The man has no power, no influence and no importance
If he did he wouldn't be bleating to the choir in the Telegraph.
He's also somewhat vain using that old photograph of him as opposed to something a bit more recent!
http:// i1.mirr or.co.u k/incom ing/art icle120 462.ece /ALTERN ATES/s6 15/norm an-tebb it-pic- getty-i mages-2 0777598 4.jpg
Yesterday's man
//Socialism and the allied doctrines of the Left regard property as belonging to "the community"//
Yes you can tell that by all the Nationalisation that happened under Tony Blair's decade in power.
The man has no power, no influence and no importance
If he did he wouldn't be bleating to the choir in the Telegraph.
He's also somewhat vain using that old photograph of him as opposed to something a bit more recent!
http://
Yesterday's man
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.