ChatterBank30 mins ago
How Can It Be Wrong To Openly Say You Do Not Like Certain People?
146 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 21362/I -stand- Jewish- people- Lawyer- loses-c areer-o ffice-r ant-que ue-jump ing-man -medica l-centr e.html
/// Trouble began after she attended the Bardoc medical centre in Bury with her baby. The hearing was told a man dressed in Orthodox Jewish attire 'caused a scene' at the surgery and as a result was seen first by a doctor. ///
/// Back at the law firm Mrs Morris relayed the incident to a receptionist she shared her office with and said: 'I cannot stand Jewish people.' ///
Would she had been so treated if she had said "I cannot stand old people"?
/// Trouble began after she attended the Bardoc medical centre in Bury with her baby. The hearing was told a man dressed in Orthodox Jewish attire 'caused a scene' at the surgery and as a result was seen first by a doctor. ///
/// Back at the law firm Mrs Morris relayed the incident to a receptionist she shared her office with and said: 'I cannot stand Jewish people.' ///
Would she had been so treated if she had said "I cannot stand old people"?
Answers
If you have disliked most (or all) of the Jews you have ever met there is a strong likelihood that you will dislike any others that you meet. Even if you have only met a very small proportion of the total Jewish population that is your personal experience. It’s called using your experience to help you in the future. Based on your experience, to say “I don’t...
13:11 Thu 09th May 2013
This case has been brought to court because the receptionist had issues with the law firm and no other reason. I've heard a lot worse go unnoticed in similar circumstances. She was not in a public place,not inciting anyone to racial hatred, but expressing a personal opinion, albeit not in the best of taste and not PC, but this is just another case of 'what can I do my employer for' scenario.
/semantics and pedantry/
baz
that seems to be your label for people exchanging ideas with an effort to be accurate, clear and honest
no doubt such concerns conflict with your own evident preferences for posting in language that is sloppy, misleading or meaningless clichés
and let's not even get into your disturbing trait of launching into personal attacks against other ABers without any provocation
presumably that is a substitute when not having any useful ideas to add to the debate
Would it be 'discriminatory' to ask if you are an usually short person?
baz
that seems to be your label for people exchanging ideas with an effort to be accurate, clear and honest
no doubt such concerns conflict with your own evident preferences for posting in language that is sloppy, misleading or meaningless clichés
and let's not even get into your disturbing trait of launching into personal attacks against other ABers without any provocation
presumably that is a substitute when not having any useful ideas to add to the debate
Would it be 'discriminatory' to ask if you are an usually short person?
I don't think you could speak you mind in the old days. Certainly not if you were the underdog. That's the problem. It was OK to speak your mind, only if you happened to be in the majority. Perhaps the same is true today, although the difference, hopefully, is that the majority position these days is intolerant of racism and discrimination rather than encouraging it.
Watching what you are saying is good manners whatever the topic in case someone in earshot may be offended, that has always been the case. It's when the law becomes involved over an opinion someone has voiced, not incitement to hatred or violence, not a verbal attack, just an opinion, however misguided or narrow minded, just an opinion, a dislike of a certain group of people. If that is all that is said and then to try and take legal action, we are going down a very slippery slope.
I can see what Bazile means, and I can see what dave50 means.
The problem the CPS have is that there's a whole grey area in these matters. Anyone should be able to say, "I can't stand " without fear of arrest. Personally, I think it should be down to friends/colleagues/employers to deal with the person, either by excluding them or disciplining them.
I don't think the law really needs to get involved.
The problem the CPS have is that there's a whole grey area in these matters. Anyone should be able to say, "I can't stand " without fear of arrest. Personally, I think it should be down to friends/colleagues/employers to deal with the person, either by excluding them or disciplining them.
I don't think the law really needs to get involved.
Zeuhl - I think the point is that people are not rational by and large and hold opinions that are accumulated from experience, upbringing etc. If these opinions are abhorrent to most people then one would hope the person holding that opinion would modify his views over time via peer pressure and the obvious disdain of other people.
I would agree with Dave that invoking legislation to try to curb peoples opinions would be a very bad idea indeed.
I would agree with Dave that invoking legislation to try to curb peoples opinions would be a very bad idea indeed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.