Jokes1 min ago
Girl Guides
47 Answers
Tonight's Sky News reports that the Girl Guides have decided to change their oath. Gone is any reference to God, being true to myself and my beliefs being substituted, and to my country, my community being substituted. However Guides will still swear allegiance to the Queen, their patron. Is the removal of any allegiance to your country a foolish step? Community suggests a divisiveness which we should be at pains to stop.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FredPuli43. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.@ Mikey I agree that religion is important in the US, but as far as the official machinery of state is concerned, they are avowedly secular- church- state separation is alive and well, unlike here in the UK with out cohort of unelected bishops sitting in the House of Lords. etc.
Much of the religious observance at council meetings in the US - prayers before starting, that sort of thing - are being challenged, and are I think technically unconstitutional ( although I might have that wrong). Indeed, there is no constitutional reason why the President needs to swear an oath to god on the bible, as they currently do - but it has become a tradition.
And you are of course right that it is more likely that, say, a muslim or a hindu is more likely to be elected ahead of a self-declared atheist.
That is slowly changing though- religious observances in schools, in courthouses and other state institutions are regularly challenged, and there is an increase in self-declared agnostics/atheists/no religion individuals, as evidenced by a recent survey...
Much of the religious observance at council meetings in the US - prayers before starting, that sort of thing - are being challenged, and are I think technically unconstitutional ( although I might have that wrong). Indeed, there is no constitutional reason why the President needs to swear an oath to god on the bible, as they currently do - but it has become a tradition.
And you are of course right that it is more likely that, say, a muslim or a hindu is more likely to be elected ahead of a self-declared atheist.
That is slowly changing though- religious observances in schools, in courthouses and other state institutions are regularly challenged, and there is an increase in self-declared agnostics/atheists/no religion individuals, as evidenced by a recent survey...
Jake.
\\\\Nationalism was a major cause of two world wars in the last century - nothing to do with immigration every thing to do with the cynical stoking of patriotism in the gullible \\\
That was then, this is now.........different problems........nothing to do with immigration?...perhaps the Jewish community might disagree.
"It's called 'change' - build a bridge and get over it "
Yes, you are correct..........although over my lifespan, I have seen many bridges collapse....
\\\\Nationalism was a major cause of two world wars in the last century - nothing to do with immigration every thing to do with the cynical stoking of patriotism in the gullible \\\
That was then, this is now.........different problems........nothing to do with immigration?...perhaps the Jewish community might disagree.
"It's called 'change' - build a bridge and get over it "
Yes, you are correct..........although over my lifespan, I have seen many bridges collapse....
Not sure about removing the "country" part but certainly changing to a more ambiguous God term is very sensible.
How many children are likely to believe in God because their parents do? This is a very young age to be deciding about religion.
I do like the "community" part, because it can be interpreted in many ways.
To most kids it will probably mean just their street or school, which is a great start.
How many children are likely to believe in God because their parents do? This is a very young age to be deciding about religion.
I do like the "community" part, because it can be interpreted in many ways.
To most kids it will probably mean just their street or school, which is a great start.
LG -//church- state separation is alive and well//
Whilst I agree with you that the constitution, if followed, is an admirable document that we would do well to adopt in this country. I cannot find anywhere a single American politician who is a declared atheist.
I have read that it is impossible for an atheist to get elected for any sort of public office in America. I obviously can't verify that as a fact but, as stated, there are no atheists in the US government to my knowledge.
Whilst I agree with you that the constitution, if followed, is an admirable document that we would do well to adopt in this country. I cannot find anywhere a single American politician who is a declared atheist.
I have read that it is impossible for an atheist to get elected for any sort of public office in America. I obviously can't verify that as a fact but, as stated, there are no atheists in the US government to my knowledge.
Jno - From the same poll,
While 30 percent responded that the Bible is the actual word of God, a clear plurality of 49 percent preferred the second interpretation, and 17 percent believe the Bible to be a book of fables and legends.
The second interpretation being.
The Bible is the inspired word of God, but not everything in it should be taken literally.
While 30 percent responded that the Bible is the actual word of God, a clear plurality of 49 percent preferred the second interpretation, and 17 percent believe the Bible to be a book of fables and legends.
The second interpretation being.
The Bible is the inspired word of God, but not everything in it should be taken literally.
Hi Fred, no I am English. I am not a racist but I think this move is just another case of de christianising this country.when the queen dies and someone writes a new national anthem, I wouldn,t mind betting that the the word GOD is missing from it. This in my opinion is how things in this country and the USA are going..
@Sammo. "I think this move is just another case of de christianising this country" - well, thats a good thing, in my opinion.
Neither the Guides nor the Scouts come to that were founded as expressly christian organisations.
In an era of a secular society with multiple faiths, and significant minority professing none, removing god from state and government institutions as well as organisations like the Guides and Scouts is welcome progress toward a more inclusive society that better reflects modern day cultural values.
And once again - despite what US citizens might think, the USA was not founded as a specifically christian society. The founding fathers, when constructing the constitution very carefully separated church from state. Showed a lot of common sense and foresight, those guys...
Neither the Guides nor the Scouts come to that were founded as expressly christian organisations.
In an era of a secular society with multiple faiths, and significant minority professing none, removing god from state and government institutions as well as organisations like the Guides and Scouts is welcome progress toward a more inclusive society that better reflects modern day cultural values.
And once again - despite what US citizens might think, the USA was not founded as a specifically christian society. The founding fathers, when constructing the constitution very carefully separated church from state. Showed a lot of common sense and foresight, those guys...
And ,sammo, "In God we trust" was itself first put on coinage, in 1864, because the Unionists wanted to suggest that God was on their side in the Civil War and was adopted as an alternative to "e pluribus unum" in 1956 because Eisenhower wanted to distinguish the US from the godless communists of the USSR. These were political decisions, contrary to the spirit of the Constitution.
As a Briton you seem to believe that having a (Christian) God is a requirement of being British.Why else would you complain if God, who is, after all, being asked to do our political dirty work in the anthem, was removed from it?
As a Briton you seem to believe that having a (Christian) God is a requirement of being British.Why else would you complain if God, who is, after all, being asked to do our political dirty work in the anthem, was removed from it?
That em is a false dichotomy
Just because someone does not see themselves as a patriot does not make them about to sell out to the other side the moment a war breaks out.
To me the essence of the patriot is 'My country right or wrong'
I'm sorry but if my country is in the wrong I will not support it.
I don't see much admiration for the patriots fighting for Germany in WWII
Just because someone does not see themselves as a patriot does not make them about to sell out to the other side the moment a war breaks out.
To me the essence of the patriot is 'My country right or wrong'
I'm sorry but if my country is in the wrong I will not support it.
I don't see much admiration for the patriots fighting for Germany in WWII